nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

CCIE Not Verifiable

auos

Hi,

What mean in "Hall of Fame" site, that CCIE#xxxx is (not verifiable), is that mean this number is illegal or what?

BR,
Auos.

Find more posts tagged with

SAVE $250 on Your CISCO Boot Camp — Use Code "EXAM26"

Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026

View CISCO Boot Camps

Comments

EMcCaleb

It means that when they tried to verify via Cisco validation tool they didn't get any results. This is typically an issue with spelling, name order, or the use of initials. If you take a look at some of the non-verifiable names you can sometimes spot the issue right away.

inscom.brigade

might be an inactive, number. I just read that after 2 years when your # expire, if you have not renewed, that you have 1 year to take your written and then all is OK fine with your number. If this turns out to be true then you have every 3 years to do you written to stay in good standing?

gorebrush

I think you really need to be doing the written every 2 years.

OR, take a written from a different track (my plan...)

RouteMyPacket

inscom.brigade wrote: »

might be an inactive, number. I just read that after 2 years when your # expire, if you have not renewed, that you have 1 year to take your written and then all is OK fine with your number. If this turns out to be true then you have every 3 years to do you written to stay in good standing?

After three years you lose your number and have to start all over again (Written + Lab).