kohr-ah wrote: » I used to but I stopped mostly because it was slow slow slow. So instead bought a years VPN connection with multi-endpoint options for $40
wes allen wrote: » This. Check out this list for VPN providers. Also, unless you are very, very careful, it is possible to leak information from the browser bundles. Using a full distro, rather then the browser is probably more secure.Which VPN Services Take Your Anonymity Seriously? 2014 Edition | TorrentFreak
techfiend wrote: » PIA user too, I've used tor in chrome before and it's very slow, lots of latency in all those hops. Never used tor browser but I'd imagine it's the same sort of experience. It should keep you anonymous but so should a good vpn, to a point. Tor has had some security issues in the past, that's how silk road was shutdown.
kohr-ah wrote: » Use PIA myself. Number one on that list. Never had an issue.
markulous wrote: » Same here. PIA doesn't throttle my bandwidth much and seems pretty secure.
jamthat wrote: » For what it's worth, my speedtests (generic speedtest.net type stuff) were faster with PIA when I was on Cox. It's all equal with uverse now. PIA is good stuff!
techfiend wrote: » That's surprising pia (in .nl) has better speeds then cox. Where was the speedtest located?
VIDEODROME wrote: » I noticed Google distrusts Tor network behavior and has asked me for Captchas.