Alex90 wrote: » So the news is finally out...https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/community/ccna-ccnp-collaboration No more CCNA Voice, no more CCNP Voice but Collaboration instead.
Alex90 wrote: » If you can do CCNP Voice by the end of the year then do it, you can then just take the CIPT2 equivalent CCNP Collab exam and then you get CCNP Collab as well.
Alex90 wrote: » I need to make sure I can bang out the CCNP Voice by the time they stop doing it, I've got ICOMM booked for the beginning of next month so can start on the CCNP Voice straight after that. I think I will probably start with CIPT1/2 first, then CVOICE, CAPPS and TVOICE. Although they haven't set a last day to test date yet I'd imagine it will be either November/December so I think providing I put the required work in I can have the CCNP Voice finished by that point. Get CIPTV2 done after that and I'll be able to get CCNP Voice and Collaboration . That's the plan, now I just have to make it work!
lisandroq wrote: » Does anyone knows if after having the ccnp voice and taking the ciptv2 exam we would hold both certifications or just a migration from voice to collaboration (replacement) as it happened with ccie voice that making the written you migrate but you won't get both??? If is just a migration it's not really good changing a 5 exam cert with qos knowledge for a 4 exam exam with video knowledge..
theodoxa wrote: » I just noticed that the CCNP: Collaboration exams require "A Valid CCNA: Collaboration", so it looks like you would also need either CIVND or VIVND on top of CIPTv2 to get CCNP: Collaboration.
negru_tudor wrote: » Well yes, that's going to be the case if you're starting fresh..however, i think you can get away with it if you have a valid CCNP Voice (as mentioned above) and take CIPTV2..that way you'll get your CCNP Collaboration ...not sure if the CCNA Voice will get the bump as well but hey... a CCNP outweighs a CCNA don't it ?:)
ande0255 wrote: » I would imagine each piece of paper weighs about the same amount
negru_tudor wrote: » can't argue with that
JeanM wrote: » Haha right? Seems Collab would be more "up to date" with the times as they say . Now to think about what video end points to get for the lab oi
JeanM wrote: » That looks to be the case, not sure how current it is?https://learningnetwork.cisco.com/docs/DOC-20806 There is a mention of jabber video and telepresence, but not exactly sure what that entails. Cisco Jabber Video for Cisco Telepresence* *In backbone, no candidate configuration required
(Note: VCS is present in the backbone only – and all the hard work is on the VCS and out of the control of the student). So then you think to yourself, “… well Jabber, Jabber must be in the blueprints at least!” – and it is in the blueprint … and from looking at the written and lab blueprint we can clearly see that it’s worth a whopping 6% in the written and 8% in the lab.
pitviper wrote: » Interesting - I took the older curriculum for CCNP:Voice. I'm assuming I can just take CIPTv2.
pitviper wrote: » Yeah, it's not very clear. The video push is causing me to lose interest in voice in general - For what it costs to implement, it's driving people away from Cisco voice/video in the masses.