Baseline testing for desktops?
I'm trying to measure the impact of adding some real time monitoring software in a Win7 enterprise environment. So i need to get a baseline of the average desktop without this software added. Then I will need to test again with the software added to see what I get.
I have found tons of stuff for servers, but most desktop stuff is hardware related or graphics related. I'm thinking Passmark is the way to go, but I figured I would put this out to TE.
Anyone have experience in a similar situation?
I have found tons of stuff for servers, but most desktop stuff is hardware related or graphics related. I'm thinking Passmark is the way to go, but I figured I would put this out to TE.
Anyone have experience in a similar situation?
Currently Working On
CWTS, then WireShark
CWTS, then WireShark
Comments
-
joelsfood Member Posts: 1,027 ■■■■■■□□□□I would probably go with PC Mark 8 Applications Test or Work test, depending on what all the desktops run.
What kind of monitoring are you doing at a desktop level though? In my experience, most desktops aren't worth extensive monitoring/configuration. Wipe, reimage and move on. -
kriscamaro68 Member Posts: 1,186 ■■■■■■■□□□You could use Perfmon built into windows. It allows for baselines.
-
Mike-Mike Member Posts: 1,860kriscamaro68 wrote: »You could use Perfmon built into windows. It allows for baselines.
thanks, I forgot to add that in there, I am using that as well, I just wanted another source to compare toCurrently Working On
CWTS, then WireShark -
Mike-Mike Member Posts: 1,860I would probably go with PC Mark 8 Applications Test or Work test, depending on what all the desktops run.
What kind of monitoring are you doing at a desktop level though? In my experience, most desktops aren't worth extensive monitoring/configuration. Wipe, reimage and move on.
thanks for the recommendations, I will check those out.
I work in a weird environment, they act like wiping a laptop is as labor intensive as shoveling asphalt. They also want to be secure without security software. I'm adding an anti-exploit tool, and it has no impact, but I have to "prove it".Currently Working On
CWTS, then WireShark -
dmoore44 Member Posts: 646I'm adding an anti-exploit tool, and it has no impact, but I have to "prove it".
Well, now we know where they like to offload all that labor intensive stuff...Graduated Carnegie Mellon University MSIT: Information Security & Assurance Currently Reading Books on TensorFlow