dustervoice wrote: » Join the rest of us.. it was really a difficult exam. out of the 150 questions ,there was only about 15 that i know i got correct the rest i have no clue.
Remedymp wrote: » What was your study material?
dustervoice wrote: » Review Manual. IT RISK framework, IT Risk Practitioners Guide, Q&A, etc, etc, etc ,etc. 70% of what was on the test i didnt see in any of the material I studied. Strange one thats all i can say.
lavidicus wrote: » I took the test today and I was either picking the detractors constantly, or the individual writing the questions and answers placed the answers in a sequence. It seems like the test was mostly just an exam to see if some uber nerd could outwit you rather than testing your knowledge of subject mater covered by the study materials. I prepared for the CISA using 3 different video courses, read 2-3 books and the review manual. I've taken alot of practice tests and scored higher than 80% on the domains. The questions and the possible answers were very diluted... I'm really frustrated with this test... I passed the CISSP last month, and it wasn't even this convoluted. Luckily I dont need this for my current or future jobs, I wanted it to be an independent auditor, but If I did fail it I wont be taking another ISACA test.
lavidicus wrote: » I'm glad you feel good about your test and I hope you passed. My issue is strictly the way the questions were worded and the possible options. We paid $500+ dollars for a test that felt like it had little to do with auditing, its just irritating. When I took the CISSP i knew that there would be a gap between what the study material taught me and what I would see on the test. The CISA's intuition gap seemed a mile wide.