Question about eigrp

mister_417

Hello i config eight 8 router with protocol eigrp the problem when i write command show ip route i show one subnet because i config all router can you help me?

mikeybinec

God I swear this looks like the OSPF question you/someone presented a week or so ago

Let's see the command sh ip proto


But where's router? Give all your routers names Your cli/topology doesnt say router0 or router1 or ......



Go to router config and put in no auto..eigrp is working on your router but it's summarizing

Router(config)#router eigrp 1(<---or whatever you autonomous system number is)+
Router(config-router)#no auto

mister_417

Sorry i found mistake topic closed.

rob42

mikeybinec wrote: »

God I swear this looks like the OSPF question you/someone presented a week or so ago

Let's see the command sh ip proto


But where's router? Give all your routers names Your cli/topology doesnt say router0 or router1 or ......



Go to router config and put in no auto..eigrp is working on your router but it's summarizing

Router(config)#router eigrp 1(<---or whatever you autonomous system number is)+
Router(config-router)#no auto

It's almost identical; an extra link between R5 and R6.

But, if it's good for OSPF, why not EIGRP. In fact you can even run RIP on it.

rob42

As a follow-on: Real World Question.

Is there any reason that you'd run more than one routing protocol (e.g: for load balance?) or is it that the CPU/Memory overheads would outweigh the benefits?

Just a thought...