Question about eigrp

mister_417mister_417 Posts: 18Member ■□□□□□□□□□
Hello i config eight 8 router with protocol eigrp the problem when i write command show ip route i show one subnet because i config all router can you help me?

Comments

  • mikeybinecmikeybinec Senior Member Posts: 482Member ■■■□□□□□□□
    God I swear this looks like the OSPF question you/someone presented a week or so ago

    Let's see the command sh ip proto


    But where's router? Give all your routers names Your cli/topology doesnt say router0 or router1 or ......



    Go to router config and put in no auto..eigrp is working on your router but it's summarizing

    Router(config)#router eigrp 1(<---or whatever you autonomous system number is)+
    Router(config-router)#no auto
    Cisco NetAcad Cuyamaca College
    A.S. LAN Management 2010 Grossmont College
    B.S. I.T. Management 2013 National University
  • mister_417mister_417 Posts: 18Member ■□□□□□□□□□
    Sorry i found mistake topic closed.
  • rob42rob42 Posts: 423Member
    mikeybinec wrote: »
    God I swear this looks like the OSPF question you/someone presented a week or so ago

    Let's see the command sh ip proto


    But where's router? Give all your routers names Your cli/topology doesnt say router0 or router1 or ......



    Go to router config and put in no auto..eigrp is working on your router but it's summarizing

    Router(config)#router eigrp 1(<---or whatever you autonomous system number is)+
    Router(config-router)#no auto

    It's almost identical; an extra link between R5 and R6.

    But, if it's good for OSPF, why not EIGRP. In fact you can even run RIP on it.
    No longer an active member
  • rob42rob42 Posts: 423Member
    As a follow-on: Real World Question.

    Is there any reason that you'd run more than one routing protocol (e.g: for load balance?) or is it that the CPU/Memory overheads would outweigh the benefits?

    Just a thought...
    No longer an active member
Sign In or Register to comment.