Vendor-specific cert has vendor-neutral cert as a requirement
xagreus
Member Posts: 118 ■■■■□□□□□□
I was intrigued by this recent CompTIA announcement.
This is the second time I remember seeing a vendor include another company's certification as a requirement for one of their own certifications (the first that I remember seeing was the MSCA: Linux on Azure, which requires the LFCS). There are probably others that I'm not aware of.
Do you all expect this practice to become a more popular? If so, what do think other instances might look like?
Thanks in advance for your viewpoints/insights.
This is the second time I remember seeing a vendor include another company's certification as a requirement for one of their own certifications (the first that I remember seeing was the MSCA: Linux on Azure, which requires the LFCS). There are probably others that I'm not aware of.
Do you all expect this practice to become a more popular? If so, what do think other instances might look like?
Thanks in advance for your viewpoints/insights.
A+, Net+, Sec+, CySA+, CCNA, ITIL 2011 Foundation, AWS CCP, ISC2 CC, MS SC-900, MS AZ-900
2024 goals: AZ-900, Cloud+, Palo Alto PCNSA, CyberOps Associate, DevNet Associate, Project+
2024 goals: AZ-900, Cloud+, Palo Alto PCNSA, CyberOps Associate, DevNet Associate, Project+
Comments
-
yoba222
Member Posts: 1,237 ■■■■■■■■□□
I don't know if it will become a trend or not, but for the time being, I bet non-CySA+ holders could exploit this for %20 off.
A+, Network+, CCNA, LFCS,
Security+, eJPT, CySA+, PenTest+,
Cisco CyberOps, GCIH, VHL,
In progress: OSCP
