# Usable Subnets Explanation

cardinalphin
Posts:

**2**Registered Users ■□□□□□□□□□
in CCNA & CCENT

Good morning,

I'm having a hard time understanding the answer to the following question:

Thanks in advance!

I'm having a hard time understanding the answer to the following question:

I know the correct answer is 126 subnets and 510 hosts. I believe I understand the 510 hosts. I don't fully understand the 126 subnets. Why do we subtract 2 when we're not enabling subnet zero instead of just 1? I feel like everything I've learned previously indicates we calculate subnets as 2^^n where n indicates the number of bits borrowed for the subnet. I get what the answer is, just don't understand the why.You have an IP of 156.233.42.56 with a subnet mask of 7 bits. How many hosts and subnets are possible assuming that subnet 0 is not used?

126 subnets and 510 hosts

128 subnets and 512 hosts

510 subnets and 126 hosts

Thanks in advance!

0

## Comments

1,243Member ■■■■■■■□□□Regarding subnets... It should be 2^7 which is 128, subtract the subnet 0 then we get 127.

The only explanation I have is they meant both "subnet zero" and "subnet all-ones", but forgot to mention the second in the question. Subnet zero is not all-ones subnet, but at some point the internet treated them the same -- it was not allowed/discouraged to use BOTH.

Overall, just a little rant, Cisco is so tiring with their hanging on this stupidity which is classful addressing and routing that is not in use for >20 years. Who cares? We are about to forget IPv4 altogether but rest assured long after IPv6 gets implemented in >99% networks Cisco will be teaching a full-on classful IPv4 addressing. My ass...

2Registered Users ■□□□□□□□□□If anyone strolls across this thread later, Cisco has a page explaining this:

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/dynamic-address-allocation-resolution/13711-40.html

Thanks again for your help!

1,243Member ■■■■■■■□□□2Registered Users ■□□□□□□□□□Here's a tip to get faster as well...

simply write out the binary conversion table for the last octet when figuring out your subnet mask etc... : 128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1

Cover up the 1 and boom there is your 2^(bits) table. Continue on as needed.

240Member ■■■□□□□□□□128 192 224 240 248 252 254 255 as subnets

128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1 as block size

You will need to adjust for number of hosts and subnets based on the class of network unless VLSM is in play.

I highly recommend you see what is happening in binary. Sometimes that is the quickest way for me to find the network address based on a host address and subnet mask.

100Member ■■■□□□□□□□Here's my logical thinking when getting a question like this on an exam. I've written it out for explanation but a lot of it can be done in your head after plenty of practice, or by writing down only the 2^n line:

This is a class B so the default subnet mask is /16 or 255.255.0.0 or 11111111.11111111.00000000.00000000

It's stating you have an additional 7 bits used for the network. This leaves 9 bits for hosts.

So this is /23 or 255.255.252.0 or 11111111.11111111.11111110.00000000

Looking at the 3rd and 4th octet of the SM in binary, which is where the subnetting is taking place:

Total Host bits = 9 = 2^9 = 512-2 not usable = 510 usable Hosts

Total Net bits = 7 = 2^7 = 128-1 subnet 0 = 127 Nets

Thinking logically to eliminate wrong answers, the last answer is obviously incorrect based on our answer above.

The question doesn't mention to remove the 2 non usable hosts, so hosts could be 512 or 510

The 2 choices for total subnets are 126 and 128. It said to assume subnet 0 is not used. For 128 it is used so that eliminates that answer.

This leaves one answer which is the one I would choose.

126 subnets and 510 hosts

[X] CCNA ICND2 200-105

[X] CCNP Route 300-101

[X] CCNP Switch 300-115

[ ] CCNP Tshoot 300-135