The Death of TE
slinuxuzer
Member Posts: 665 ■■■■□□□□□□
in Off-Topic
So not to be too dramatic, but I just logged in for the first time in a week or two, obviously there has been some kind of change here, and I get it. But I have to question the wisdom of changing the entire interace, especially since it seems to be a worse experience and isn't even plugging any advertising, it seems the new guard has changed it for the sake of letting everyone know "something happened", but if the change hasn't brought any value to the members, or the owners, then WTF is the point? I for one after 15 years am looking for a new home. I get that things change, but this is one hell of a ham handed change that I fail to see the value in.
Comments
-
JDMurray Admin Posts: 13,099 AdminIt's the same great content, just a little brighter and fluffier. Today, more Web sites look like the new TE than the old TE. In fact, if you insisted on only using circa 2000-style Websites, you'd be using hardly any Websites at all. That being said, there's no harm in requesting a user-settable feature that sets the color scheme to "battleship gray."
-
slinuxuzer Member Posts: 665 ■■■■□□□□□□JDMurray said:It's the same great content, just a little brighter and fluffier. Today, more Web sites look like the new TE than the old TE. In fact, if you insisted on only using circa 2000-style Websites, you'd be using hardly any Websites at all. That being said, there's no harm in requesting a user-settable feature that sets the color scheme to "battleship gray."
-
chrisone Member Posts: 2,278 ■■■■■■■■■□This is an evolving process. Your input is vaulable, which is rare for forums and web design these days.Certs: CISSP, EnCE, OSCP, CRTP, eCTHPv2, eCPPT, eCIR, LFCS, CEH, SPLK-1002, SC-200, SC-300, AZ-900, AZ-500, VHL:Advanced+
2023 Cert Goals: SC-100, eCPTX -
slinuxuzer Member Posts: 665 ■■■■□□□□□□chrisone said:This is an evolving process. Your input is vaulable, which is rare for forums and web design these days.
-
PJ_Sneakers Member Posts: 884 ■■■■■■□□□□It's an adjustment for sure, but I don't see how it is much different or harder to use than the old UI.
This is more like going from Win2k to Win10 than going from Win7 to Win8. But that's my opinion. -
chrisone Member Posts: 2,278 ■■■■■■■■■□slinuxuzer said:chrisone said:This is an evolving process. Your input is vaulable, which is rare for forums and web design these days.Certs: CISSP, EnCE, OSCP, CRTP, eCTHPv2, eCPPT, eCIR, LFCS, CEH, SPLK-1002, SC-200, SC-300, AZ-900, AZ-500, VHL:Advanced+
2023 Cert Goals: SC-100, eCPTX -
slinuxuzer Member Posts: 665 ■■■■□□□□□□PJ_Sneakers said:It's an adjustment for sure, but I don't see how it is much different or harder to use than the old UI.
This is more like going from Win2k to Win10 than going from Win7 to Win8. But that's my opinion. -
slinuxuzer Member Posts: 665 ■■■■□□□□□□chrisone said:slinuxuzer said:chrisone said:This is an evolving process. Your input is vaulable, which is rare for forums and web design these days.chrisone said:slinuxuzer said:chrisone said:This is an evolving process. Your input is vaulable, which is rare for forums and web design these days.
-
PJ_Sneakers Member Posts: 884 ■■■■■■□□□□Yes, I fully realize that I skipped many of those horrible versions of Windows.
-
tedjames Member Posts: 1,182 ■■■■■■■■□□The new interface does take some time to get used to. It's not so bad that I'd ever want to cancel my account. The content is as good as ever. However, the biggest improvement for me and a lot of others is the move to HTTPS. The old site used HTTP.
-
shochan Member Posts: 1,014 ■■■■■■■■□□I agree Ted, it is taking some time getting used to the interface. I feel I have to scroll even more on the new site, but it is definitely better for the 40+yo as far as viewing the content. LOL! The old TE had its simplistic features, but some of those settings were off the wall too. Eventually, I am sure it will get better over time. CHEERS & Hi5!CompTIA A+, Network+, i-Net+, MCP 70-210, CNA v5, Server+, Security+, Cloud+, CySA+, ISC² CC, ISC² SSCP
-
slinuxuzer Member Posts: 665 ■■■■□□□□□□Skyliinez92 said:The content is still here. You can still access support for exams and training just like you did with the old version. It's just a new design, and the admins are listening to our feedback and will hopefully work on a few features.
By all means, offer your advice, but if people are going to throw their toys out of the pram on the first day and decide to leave without offering creative feedback and patience, then it sounds like you had no respect for the site to begin with. -
EANx Member Posts: 1,077 ■■■■■■■■□□It's all valuable input. I'm not particularly happy either, and not because it's a change. But I'm willing to let things settle down a bit and give the owners a chance to respond to user issues. And I think that's key.
-
TechGromit Member Posts: 2,156 ■■■■■■■■■□What's this Tech Exams I keep hearing about? If you look at the webpage address at the top, this is the Community.infosecinstitute.com, long live Info Sec Institute.
Still searching for the corner in a round room. -
shochan Member Posts: 1,014 ■■■■■■■■□□^^ HA! ^^CompTIA A+, Network+, i-Net+, MCP 70-210, CNA v5, Server+, Security+, Cloud+, CySA+, ISC² CC, ISC² SSCP
-
scaredoftests Mod Posts: 2,780 Moda tad bit dramatic about the 'death of TE'. :-\Never let your fear decide your fate....
-
PJ_Sneakers Member Posts: 884 ■■■■■■□□□□LOL, it's kinda humorous, but they could solve this problem my creating a techexams.infosecinstitute.com alias. But I have a feeling that these guys would still find something to complain about.
-
MitM Member Posts: 622 ■■■■□□□□□□I can't say I disagree all that much with @slinuxuzer
I think if they are listening to the feedback and make the necessary adjustments, the site will be fine. However, bad site or good site, old site or new site, the community of people has always been the best thing about TE. That hasn't changed, so I think you and others should stick around -
slinuxuzer Member Posts: 665 ■■■■□□□□□□triplea said:just opened my eyes lol
-
DatabaseHead Member Posts: 2,757 ■■■■■■■■■■I still can't believe in 2018 almost 2019 people are reviewing the web hunched over on a desktop/laptop and not on a mobile device or tablet. Strange......
The new format is REALLY good on a mobile device which IMO is the smart way to go. It would be interesting if they used Google analytics to see what percentage of users were on a desktop/laptop vs mobile.... -
kaiju Member Posts: 453 ■■■■■■■□□□DatabaseHead said:I still can't believe in 2018 almost 2019 people are reviewing the web hunched over on a desktop/laptop and not on a mobile device or tablet. Strange......
The new format is REALLY good on a mobile device which IMO is the smart way to go. It would be interesting if they used Google analytics to see what percentage of users were on a desktop/laptop vs mobile....From my own personal experience, browser viewing on a tablet with a 8.0~13" screen is more enjoyable when using the mobile browser's desktop view mode. I actually do this on my Nexus 6 electronic leash if I decide to do some browsing. For me, my mobile devices are convenience items while my personal/work desktops and laptops are utilized 75% of the time.
Work smarter NOT harder! Semper Gumby! -
Jon_Cisco Member Posts: 1,772 ■■■■■■■■□□DatabaseHead said:I still can't believe in 2018 almost 2019 people are reviewing the web hunched over on a desktop/laptop and not on a mobile device or tablet. Strange......
The new format is REALLY good on a mobile device which IMO is the smart way to go. It would be interesting if they used Google analytics to see what percentage of users were on a desktop/laptop vs mobile....Why would I sit in front of my 27" monitor and pull out my phone to check a few online forums? I tried it on the phone and it's not that bad but I read Tech Exams on my coffee break not at a coffee house. I still say the screen is to bright. One of the things that was great about the old site was it was easy on your eyes. Overall I am getting use to the new site but like many I enjoyed the old site where I went only for the community and not the flashy interface.Many people question how this site is making a profit. I am sure it allows them to drive traffic and improve ratings on sites like Google. Old members are not going to suddenly start using Infosec but new members might. -
EANx Member Posts: 1,077 ■■■■■■■■□□DatabaseHead said:I still can't believe in 2018 almost 2019 people are reviewing the web hunched over on a desktop/laptop and not on a mobile device or tablet. Strange......
The new format is REALLY good on a mobile device which IMO is the smart way to go. It would be interesting if they used Google analytics to see what percentage of users were on a desktop/laptop vs mobile....
-
Pseudonymous Member Posts: 78 ■■■□□□□□□□tedjames said:The new interface does take some time to get used to. It's not so bad that I'd ever want to cancel my account. The content is as good as ever. However, the biggest improvement for me and a lot of others is the move to HTTPS. The old site used HTTP.Agreed. Although I honestly didn't like the name TechExams either. I actually found myself switching away from the website when people walked by because I didn't want them thinking TechExams was a brain **** site. It wasn't really a good name to begin with, but even though I prefer the old look of the forums, I'll take this with HTTPS over the old style any day. It just takes a while to get used to.slinuxuzer said:So not to be too dramaticYou titled the thread THE DEATH OF TE. Yup... that's pretty dramatic. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯DatabaseHead said:I still can't believe in 2018 almost 2019 people are reviewing the web hunched over on a desktop/laptop and not on a mobile device or tablet. Strange......
Certifications: A+, N+, S+, CCNA: CyberOps, eJPT, ITIL, etc. -
PJ_Sneakers Member Posts: 884 ■■■■■■□□□□
-
cyberguypr Mod Posts: 6,928 ModSomehow I missed this thread. Fantastic drama. Just remember how long it took for changes to happen pre-Infosec Institute. Remember how long it took to implement that SSL certificate that never happened? Exactly!
Change happens. Those of us who have been here for a long time helping others are still around. All historical data got migrated. Categories were revamped to reflect the comunity's interest. Sounds like a win to me.
Does the white layout burn my retina? Sure! But it's been made clear that management is looking into a solution. Just remember Rome wasn't built in a day.
-
PJ_Sneakers Member Posts: 884 ■■■■■■□□□□Maybe you missed the thread because you were too busy dying.
-
PC509 Member Posts: 804 ■■■■■■□□□□Well, they asked for input before the change. They asked for ideas for new forums. They asked for input after the change. And they have taken it all into consideration and are implementing the users ideas and suggestions (if possible). The support from the admins has been amazing compared to many other forums. They'll answer you if you ask a question, they interact, they want this forum to remain a great one.
Death of TE? Nah. Yea, it needs some changes. But, give input and they work on it. At first I hated it. They made a few changes and it's getting better. It's still a work in progress, but it's coming along nicely. -
LonerVamp Member Posts: 518 ■■■■■■■■□□I think the "Death of TE" is way overdramatic, but I'll agree that my feeling when I browse this site is no longer about a community or forum system, but a somewhat chunky blog comment system without the blog with some weird choices. Popular Categories? Why does that have to be there to take up space? Who's Online? Who honestly really cares about that, especially when you don't even see many until the +45 Guests "more" link.
Security Engineer/Analyst/Geek, Red & Blue Teams
OSCP, GCFA, GWAPT, CISSP, OSWP, AWS SA-A, AWS Security, Sec+, Linux+, CCNA Cyber Ops, CCSK
2021 goals: maybe AWAE or SLAE, bunch o' courses and red team labs?
This discussion has been closed.