no rip update for networks 192.168.1-254.x
hey all i hope that anyone can give me this answer becaouse im loosing it...
im trying to implement rip on my router and he send me an update only to one of the interfaces
fastethernet0/0 192.168.4.26 255.255.0.0
fastethernet0/1 10.13.31.1 255.255.255.0
router rip
version 2
network 10.0.0.0
network 192.168.0.0
the update is sent only via 10.13.31.1
but when i change the ip address fastethernet0/0 to 192.168.0.x it works....
someone can pls help me...???
thank you
im trying to implement rip on my router and he send me an update only to one of the interfaces
fastethernet0/0 192.168.4.26 255.255.0.0
fastethernet0/1 10.13.31.1 255.255.255.0
router rip
version 2
network 10.0.0.0
network 192.168.0.0
the update is sent only via 10.13.31.1
but when i change the ip address fastethernet0/0 to 192.168.0.x it works....
someone can pls help me...???
thank you
Comments
-
EdTheLad Member Posts: 2,111 ■■■■□□□□□□192.168.4.26 is a class C address, you are using an illegal /16 mask, Ripv2 doesnt support
masks shorter then the natural mask.Networking, sometimes i love it, mostly i hate it.Its all about the $$$$ -
EdTheLad Member Posts: 2,111 ■■■■□□□□□□Change fastethernet0/0 192.168.4.26 255.255.0.0 to have a mask 255.255.255.0Networking, sometimes i love it, mostly i hate it.Its all about the $$$$
-
PStefanov Member Posts: 79 ■■□□□□□□□□djshubi wrote:hey all i hope that anyone can give me this answer becaouse im loosing it...
im trying to implement rip on my router and he send me an update only to one of the interfaces
fastethernet0/0 192.168.4.26 255.255.0.0
fastethernet0/1 10.13.31.1 255.255.255.0
router rip
version 2
network 10.0.0.0
network 192.168.0.0
the update is sent only via 10.13.31.1
but when i change the ip address fastethernet0/0 to 192.168.0.x it works....
someone can pls help me...???
thank you
You have misconfigured the second network statement. Type network 192.168.4.0 instead.
Pavel -
djshubi Member Posts: 5 ■□□□□□□□□□thank you all very much nut i need to publish the network as class b or mask 16. i just put a secondery address of class c the network address and its magicly works..
thank you for everything.... -
Ahriakin Member Posts: 1,799 ■■■■■■■■□□I thought RipV2 was classless (one of it's biggest improvements over v1)?We responded to the Year 2000 issue with "Y2K" solutions...isn't this the kind of thinking that got us into trouble in the first place?
-
dtlokee Member Posts: 2,378 ■■■■□□□□□□RIP v2 is classless, and will advertise a route regardless of the mask and class in use. The problem here is not related to the advertisement, but the network address in use. The problem is RIP expects a network address in the "network" command specified under the routing process. This allows advertisements to be sent on any interface matching the network address or a subnet of the network address, but not a supernet address, which is being used in this example.
Adding a secondary address with a network address or a subnet address of the classful network will allow rip to send updates onthe interface, but it will source them from the primary address of the interface.The only easy day was yesterday! -
Ahriakin Member Posts: 1,799 ■■■■■■■■□□Ah, thanks. So essentially it's support for classless is hobbled in a way, yes it advertises classless subnets but it won't accept the entirety of class range as one subnet from the Network command even if that's desired.We responded to the Year 2000 issue with "Y2K" solutions...isn't this the kind of thinking that got us into trouble in the first place?
-
djshubi Member Posts: 5 ■□□□□□□□□□Actually someone told me there is another way to advertise the super net without secondery interface but he didnt tel me how....
so if someone here have another idea it will be great and again thank you all...