ISL and dot1q?

in CCNA & CCENT
I can't find an answer online...
Could a single switch (say, 3750) have an ISL trunk to another cisco device, but another trunk using dot1q to, say, a Baystack?
or does the first trunk encap dictate all future trunk encaps?
Thanks,
mike
Could a single switch (say, 3750) have an ISL trunk to another cisco device, but another trunk using dot1q to, say, a Baystack?
or does the first trunk encap dictate all future trunk encaps?
Thanks,
mike
There are only 10 kinds of people... those who understand binary, and those that don't.
CCIE Studies: Written passed: Jan 21/12 Lab Prep: Hours reading: 385. Hours labbing: 110
Taking a time-out to add the CCVP. Capitalizing on a current IPT pilot project.
CCIE Studies: Written passed: Jan 21/12 Lab Prep: Hours reading: 385. Hours labbing: 110
Taking a time-out to add the CCVP. Capitalizing on a current IPT pilot project.
Comments
A follow up...
Hucaby suggests that it's not mandatory for the native vlans to match on either end of a trunk. Clearly it's best practice... but if it's not mandatory, does it at least cause mega errors?
Anyone seen a trunk with mismatched native vlans?
Thanks.
CCIE Studies: Written passed: Jan 21/12 Lab Prep: Hours reading: 385. Hours labbing: 110
Taking a time-out to add the CCVP. Capitalizing on a current IPT pilot project.
My bad.
EDIT... thanks for the quick reply dt. Preciate it.
CCIE Studies: Written passed: Jan 21/12 Lab Prep: Hours reading: 385. Hours labbing: 110
Taking a time-out to add the CCVP. Capitalizing on a current IPT pilot project.