mikej412 wrote: It made sense in the "old days" to get the CCNP before the CCVP and the new CCNP seems to include the "Voice 101" stuff now -- so it's still good advice. But I have said that if you have the job opportunity, you can go from the CCNA to the CCVP (and then backfill with the CCNP later).
mikej412 wrote: It really comes down to what opportunities do you have, or what's available in your area. What you'd like to do could also be a consideration. << some stuff deleted>> mhdanas wrote: Shall I go into security ( if yes, CCSA or CCSP ? ) You need to get some experience before people will trust you with their network and their security. Doing the CCSA or some of the Cisco Qualified Specialist certs (like the CQS-CFWS) can get you the "entry level" experience you'd need. But you'd also have to look at some of the higher level networking certs like the CCNP -- I wouldn't trust someone to secure a network that they didn't know how to build. Then you'd look at the CCSE or finishing the CCSP -- depending on what you like better or which gives you more opportunities. mhdanas wrote: or CCVP ? Hot! Hot! Hot! I'd usually say go for the CCNP after the CCNA -- but if you have an opportunity to work with Voice Stuff, do it. It seems to be very popular. Check out this CCVP vs CCNP thread from a day or two ago for some more CCVP info (and I did mention the CCSP in there too).
mhdanas wrote: Shall I go into security ( if yes, CCSA or CCSP ? )
mhdanas wrote: or CCVP ?
mikej412 wrote: With the CCNA you can administer a network. With the CCNP you can build the network. With the CCSP you can secure the network. So.... if you have the CCNP and CCSP, then you can build secure networks. I'd go with the CCNP first.... if there is no network built, there is nothing to secure. I feel that the CCNP lays the foundation for the rest of the professional certifications.... but that said -- if you have an opportunity at work for a voice or security position, don't hesitate to go for the other tracks first.
mikej412 wrote: There are individual threads about the equipment used for the CCVP and CCSP in the forums -- but both of these certifications (and the corresponding CCIE versions) have larger and more expensive hardware requirements than the CCNP/CCIP (and the corresponding R&S and Service Provider CCIEs). But for the CCSP and CCVP, renting rack time would still be cheaper (but less convenient) then building a home lab. The hybrid approach usually works best -- get the hardware you can afford and use rack rental for the rest. Also, Dynamips (with Dynagen) and PEMU are two emulation options to check out for the home lab. If you have a large Cisco Network Academy close by, they may offer a security class (and lab access) that would get you started on the CCSP. I haven't seen them hint about any Voice offerings. You might also want to check the Cisco Partner Locater and see if there are any Cisco Business Partners in your area. You could get lots of great Cisco experience working for a partner, and access to lab equipment and to the good "training stuff." The down side -- the partner may have you taking exams you didn't know existed so that they could fill "partner roles."
mikej412 wrote: Unless you are also working on a degree in College and getting certifications to differentiate yourself from the other new college graduates -- having the Professional Certification but no work experience to "back up the certifications" makes me think "dumped" when I see that on resumes.
Ahriakin wrote: While every bit of knowledge you can get about Cisco and networking in general helps it is not necessary to do the CCNP before the CCSP, obviously I didn't. If you have a strong understanding of the CCNA level topics then you'll have enough TCP/IP theory and general Router/Switch knowledge to continue into Cisco Security. I agree that effective Security requires a broader view of a network than just the topics you study but it's a chicken before the egg scenario. Unless your job specifically requires it for example knowing that MPLS circuits are often classified as VPNs but aren't usually encrypted would be enough for an initial evaluation of security and implementing threat mitigation at other levels of your network, the CCNP level knowledge of the inner workings and config of MPLS would be helpful but not necessary. Ditto with the various routing protocols, you don't need to know their config. inside out to secure them, just the security options (keys, Authentication etc. Covered in the CCSP for RIP and OSPF) they do provide and how they can be controlled on your firewalls/vpns etc. while maintaining functionality. But really what it comes down to is what your heart is in, if your interest lies with security then by all means to the CCSP next, you'd likely drag on the CCNP if R&S is not what gets you going.
Crunchyhippo wrote: since I will probably not go further than a solo "professional" cert, I wouldn't proceed past a CCNP or CCSP anyway.