backup/compression solution suggestions

jamesp1983jamesp1983 Member Posts: 2,475 ■■■■□□□□□□
in Off-Topic
I wanted to see if anyone knows of any software that will perform system backups(diffs,fulls,systemstate), and then will compress the file after it's done, even if the backed up file is on a remote system. We currently are using ntbackup to backup systems to a nas appliance. We have 4 scheduled task instances of 7zip running on the nas appliance that compress all the bkf files. The problem is that we are backing up around 1.8TB a night and 7zip isn't keeping up. We need an all in one solution. Any ideas?
"Check both the destination and return path when a route fails." "Switches create a network. Routers connect networks."
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • RTmarcRTmarc Member Posts: 1,082 ■■■□□□□□□□
    What about Backup Exec (or some other backup software) to a LTO3 tape?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jamesp1983jamesp1983 Member Posts: 2,475 ■■■■□□□□□□
    I don't know if you guys are familiar with Sungard, but we house our production side servers there. The system works like this for backups:

    -We have all our servers back up (with ntbackup) to a NAS appliance that we own (7zip runs 24/7 compressing the bkf's).
    -SG then uses Tivoli Storage Manager to pull the backups (.zip's) off that server to their SAN.
    "Check both the destination and return path when a route fails." "Switches create a network. Routers connect networks."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jamesp1983jamesp1983 Member Posts: 2,475 ■■■■□□□□□□
    Anyone ?
    "Check both the destination and return path when a route fails." "Switches create a network. Routers connect networks."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hypnotoadhypnotoad Banned Posts: 915
    I don't know anyone who is honestly happy with their backup software. I babysit backupexec each week.

    Last week: Nothing bad happened.
    Week before: Out of memory. Backups didn't run.
    Week before: Every tape mysteriously became a cleaning tape.
    Week before: Nothing bad happened.
    Week before: Every tape was seen as 1/10th it's size.
    Week before: Remote Agents decide to uninstall - backups must be re-done.

    ....Until the beginning of time.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • d4nmfd4nmf Member Posts: 56 ■■□□□□□□□□
    1.8TB!? Thats alot of data...

    I'd look into a Tape Autochanger and backup exec. If you buy the remote license then you can backup remote machines.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • remyforbes777remyforbes777 Member Posts: 499
    We actually switched from BackupExec to Commvault. If you firm has the money it takes to implement Commvault I say go for it, but it is pricey.
    Remington Forbes
    www.blacksintechnology.net
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • hypnotoadhypnotoad Banned Posts: 915
    So you're doing a full backup - is that where the 1.8 TB comes from?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • d4nmfd4nmf Member Posts: 56 ■■□□□□□□□□
    nlabelle is onto something there.....incremental or differential backups might be the best way forward...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dynamikdynamik Banned Posts: 12,312 ■■■■■■■■■□
    d4nmf wrote:
    nlabelle is onto something there.....incremental or differential backups might be the best way forward...

    It's always a good idea to include incremental and/or differential backups in your backup strategy. However, you do need to do full backup every once in awhile. You don't want to have to restore three months of incremental backups if you have to recover a system, and the differential backup will approach the size of the full backup as time progresses anyway.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • d4nmfd4nmf Member Posts: 56 ■■□□□□□□□□
    Aye, just do a full backup friday night and leave it running over the weekend icon_cool.gif
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jamesp1983jamesp1983 Member Posts: 2,475 ■■■■□□□□□□
    well we have a staggered config. We backup 32 servers per night. 4/32 are set to do their fulls on a particular night, 28/32 are doing diffs. The problem is that the compression is hogging the cpu so much on the NAS server that Sungard's utility to backup that server to tape (Tivoli Storage Mgr) can't get access to the files quick enough to be done within their window. What I'm trying to find is a utility that will backup and compress almost simultaneously across the wire to the nas device. Key is to have the cpu killed on the server that's backing itself up instead of the nas device.
    "Check both the destination and return path when a route fails." "Switches create a network. Routers connect networks."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jamesp1983jamesp1983 Member Posts: 2,475 ■■■■□□□□□□
    commvault is expensive!! 2k/server?
    "Check both the destination and return path when a route fails." "Switches create a network. Routers connect networks."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • cacharocacharo Member Posts: 361
    jimmypizzle83 wrote:
    I don't know if you guys are familiar with Sungard, but we house our production side servers there. The system works like this for backups:

    -We have all our servers back up (with ntbackup) to a NAS appliance that we own (7zip runs 24/7 compressing the bkf's).
    -SG then uses Tivoli Storage Manager to pull the backups (.zip's) off that server to their SAN.

    No plugging SunGard, I have enough work already... icon_wink.gif
    Treat people as if they were what they ought to be, and you help them become what they are capable of being.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jamesp1983jamesp1983 Member Posts: 2,475 ■■■■□□□□□□
    cacharo wrote:
    jimmypizzle83 wrote:
    I don't know if you guys are familiar with Sungard, but we house our production side servers there. The system works like this for backups:

    -We have all our servers back up (with ntbackup) to a NAS appliance that we own (7zip runs 24/7 compressing the bkf's).
    -SG then uses Tivoli Storage Manager to pull the backups (.zip's) off that server to their SAN.

    No plugging SunGard, I have enough work already... icon_wink.gif

    you work there? what do you do?
    "Check both the destination and return path when a route fails." "Switches create a network. Routers connect networks."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • cacharocacharo Member Posts: 361
    I work in their Minneapolis DC. I currently work in operations, so I really do alot in many different areas. Is your company hosted in one of the Philly DCs? If you have been onsite there, I am one of the NOC guys you would have met.
    Treat people as if they were what they ought to be, and you help them become what they are capable of being.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jamesp1983jamesp1983 Member Posts: 2,475 ■■■■□□□□□□
    I have been on site in philly. 401N broad 11th floor
    "Check both the destination and return path when a route fails." "Switches create a network. Routers connect networks."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • cacharocacharo Member Posts: 361
    Haven't been there yet, but have talked to alot of the staff. Great guys over there.
    Treat people as if they were what they ought to be, and you help them become what they are capable of being.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jamesp1983jamesp1983 Member Posts: 2,475 ■■■■□□□□□□
    Yea, they all seem to know their stuff
    "Check both the destination and return path when a route fails." "Switches create a network. Routers connect networks."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jamesp1983jamesp1983 Member Posts: 2,475 ■■■■□□□□□□
    Anyone have any opinions on any of the following:

    -Acronis True Image Echo Enterprise Server
    -Symantec backup exec 11d
    -Active Backup Expert Pro

    ?
    "Check both the destination and return path when a route fails." "Switches create a network. Routers connect networks."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RTmarcRTmarc Member Posts: 1,082 ■■■□□□□□□□
    I'm completely against NetBackup. I've never liked using it. If you are analyzing Veritas products, I'd much, much rather use Backup Exec; and that's saying a lot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • jamesp1983jamesp1983 Member Posts: 2,475 ■■■■□□□□□□
    RTmarc wrote:
    I'm completely against NetBackup. I've never liked using it. If you are analyzing Veritas products, I'd much, much rather use Backup Exec; and that's saying a lot.


    Sorry I meant backup exec 11d. Typo
    "Check both the destination and return path when a route fails." "Switches create a network. Routers connect networks."
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.