Options

MCSA 2003 and MCSA 2003 security

I just want to make sure I'm right on something. I plan on starting my MCSA 2003 soon. I know i need to take the 290, 270 and 291. I'm going to use my security+ as my elective. My question is once i become MCSA I want to become MCSA:security also, so can i use my security+ and then take one more elective and get my MCSA:security?

Comments

  • Options
    undomielundomiel Member Posts: 2,818
    Correct.
    Jumping on the IT blogging band wagon -- http://www.jefferyland.com/
  • Options
    wheelywheely Member Posts: 105
    Thanks for the quick reply. Which other elective would be a good choice to take?
  • Options
    dynamikdynamik Banned Posts: 12,312 ■■■■■■■■■□
    Your options are either 299, the general Server 2003 security exam, or one of the ISA exams (2000, 2004, or 2006).

    http://www.microsoft.com/learning/mcp/mcsa/security/windowsserver2003.mspx
  • Options
    wheelywheely Member Posts: 105
    I understand that i would either have to take the 299, 350 or 351, but in everyones opinion which one would they choose.
  • Options
    dynamikdynamik Banned Posts: 12,312 ■■■■■■■■■□
    Some people recommend doing ISA to broaden your skill set, but if you're not going to be in a position where you're going to be using it, it won't do you a lot of good. There's no reason to take one of the older ISA exams unless you're going to be specifically using it; 2006 is already two years old.

    I don't use ISA, so I'm going to be taking 299 for my MCSE: Security elective.
  • Options
    undomielundomiel Member Posts: 2,818
    I concur with dynamik, when I'm at that point I plan on doing the 299 as well. Unless of course I magically find myself working with ISA at that time.
    Jumping on the IT blogging band wagon -- http://www.jefferyland.com/
  • Options
    wheelywheely Member Posts: 105
    Just wanted to say thanks for the replies. 299 seems like the most logical choice.
Sign In or Register to comment.