policy routing using route maps

aueddonlineaueddonline Member Posts: 611
I'm trying to get telnet traffic from 10.1.3.1 which is on a directly connected subnet of R4 s0/0 going to 5.5.5.5 to be policy routed to next hop address 10.0.0.3 using a route map, config below. My guess is my ACL might be screwed,

this is appiled to s0/0 using ' ip policy route-map cloud'

R4_2691#show route-map
route-map cloud, permit, sequence 10
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): cloud
Set clauses:
ip next-hop 10.0.0.3
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes

R4_2691#show access-list
Extended IP access list cloud
10 permit tcp host 10.1.3.1 eq telnet host 5.5.5.5 gt 1023
What's another word for Thesaurus?

Comments

  • mikej412mikej412 Member Posts: 10,086 ■■■■■■■■■■
    If you're telneting from 10.1.3.1 to 5.5.5.5 -- it's 5.5.5.5 that will be listening on port 23 for a telnet connection.

    Your source port will start off on a random high port number, but the request has to go to port 23. After the connection, 5.5.5.5 if it accepts it, will respond with it's own random high port number that 10.1.3.1 should use for the connection.
    :mike: Cisco Certifications -- Collect the Entire Set!
  • aueddonlineaueddonline Member Posts: 611
    cool so just need to switch the ports round on the ACL
    What's another word for Thesaurus?
  • aueddonlineaueddonline Member Posts: 611
    route-map cloud, permit, sequence 10
    Match clauses:
    ip address (access-lists): cloud
    Set clauses:
    ip next-hop 10.0.0.3
    Policy routing matches: 55 packets, 2509 bytes


    hey i'm match packets :D thanks mike
    What's another word for Thesaurus?
  • aueddonlineaueddonline Member Posts: 611
    *Mar 1 03:20:02.363: IP: s=11.0.2.1 (Serial0/0), d=2.2.2.2, len 100, FIB policy rejected - normal forwarding
    *Mar 1 03:20:03.059: IP: s=11.0.2.1 (Serial0/0), d=2.2.2.2, len 100, FIB policy match
    *Mar 1 03:20:03.059: IP: s=11.0.2.1 (Serial0/0), d=2.2.2.2, len 100, FIB policy rejected - normal forwarding
    *Mar 1 03:20:03.067: IP: s=11.0.2.1 (Serial0/0), d=2.2.2.2, len 100, FIB policy match
    *Mar 1 03:20:03.067: IP: s=11.0.2.1 (Serial0/0), d=2.2.2.2, len 100, FIB policy rejected - normal forwarding
    *Mar 1 03:20:03.071: IP: s=11.0.2.1 (Serial0/0), d=2.2.2.2, len 100, FIB policy match
    *Mar 1 03:20:03.071: IP: s=11.0.2.1 (Serial0/0), d=2.2.2.2, len 100, FIB policy rejected - normal forwarding
    *Mar 1 03:20:03.079: IP: s=11.0.2.1 (Serial0/0), d=2.2.2.2, len 100, FIB policy match
    *Mar 1 03:20:03.079: IP: s=11.0.2.1 (Serial0/0), d=2.2.2.2, len 100, FIB policy rejected - normal forwarding


    this is a different policy, but does the debug suggest that only half of the packets are having the policy applied?
    What's another word for Thesaurus?
Sign In or Register to comment.