pix 515 w/ identical mac adress? wt...
qplayed
Member Posts: 303
Hi guys i'm about to pick up sme pix 515's but
Hardware: PIX-515, 64 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 200 MHz
Flash i28F640J5 @ 0x300, 16MB
BIOS Flash AT29C257 @ 0xfffd8000, 32KB
0: ethernet0: address is 0003.6bf6.8172, irq 11
1: ethernet1: address is 0003.6bf6.8173, irq 10
2: ethernet2: address is 0002.b35d.98bc, irq 7
Licensed Features:
Failover: Enabled
VPN-DES: Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES: Enabled
Maximum Physical Interfaces: 6
Maximum Interfaces: 10
Cut-through Proxy: Enabled
Guards: Enabled
URL-filtering: Enabled
Inside Hosts: Unlimited
Throughput: Unlimited
IKE peers: Unlimited
This PIX has a Failover Only (FO) license.
Hardware: PIX-515, 64 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 200 MHz
Flash i28F640J5 @ 0x300, 16MB
BIOS Flash AT29C257 @ 0xfffd8000, 32KB
0: ethernet0: address is 0003.6bf6.8172, irq 11
1: ethernet1: address is 0003.6bf6.8173, irq 10
2: ethernet2: address is 0002.b35d.98bc, irq 7
Licensed Features:
Failover: Enabled
VPN-DES: Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES: Enabled
Maximum Physical Interfaces: 6
Maximum Interfaces: 10
Cut-through Proxy: Enabled
Guards: Enabled
URL-filtering: Enabled
Inside Hosts: Unlimited
Throughput: Unlimited
IKE peers: Unlimited
This PIX has an Unrestricted (UR) license.
is this possible for both pix to have the same hw addresses?
smells fishy, also the serial and act key are teh only things that are diff from the
show ver output
Hardware: PIX-515, 64 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 200 MHz
Flash i28F640J5 @ 0x300, 16MB
BIOS Flash AT29C257 @ 0xfffd8000, 32KB
0: ethernet0: address is 0003.6bf6.8172, irq 11
1: ethernet1: address is 0003.6bf6.8173, irq 10
2: ethernet2: address is 0002.b35d.98bc, irq 7
Licensed Features:
Failover: Enabled
VPN-DES: Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES: Enabled
Maximum Physical Interfaces: 6
Maximum Interfaces: 10
Cut-through Proxy: Enabled
Guards: Enabled
URL-filtering: Enabled
Inside Hosts: Unlimited
Throughput: Unlimited
IKE peers: Unlimited
This PIX has a Failover Only (FO) license.
Hardware: PIX-515, 64 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 200 MHz
Flash i28F640J5 @ 0x300, 16MB
BIOS Flash AT29C257 @ 0xfffd8000, 32KB
0: ethernet0: address is 0003.6bf6.8172, irq 11
1: ethernet1: address is 0003.6bf6.8173, irq 10
2: ethernet2: address is 0002.b35d.98bc, irq 7
Licensed Features:
Failover: Enabled
VPN-DES: Enabled
VPN-3DES-AES: Enabled
Maximum Physical Interfaces: 6
Maximum Interfaces: 10
Cut-through Proxy: Enabled
Guards: Enabled
URL-filtering: Enabled
Inside Hosts: Unlimited
Throughput: Unlimited
IKE peers: Unlimited
This PIX has an Unrestricted (UR) license.
is this possible for both pix to have the same hw addresses?
smells fishy, also the serial and act key are teh only things that are diff from the
show ver output
If you cannot express in a sentence or two what
you intend to get across, then it is not focused
well enough.
—Charles Osgood, TV commentator
you intend to get across, then it is not focused
well enough.
—Charles Osgood, TV commentator
Comments
-
mikej412 Member Posts: 10,086 ■■■■■■■■■■qplayed wrote:is this possible for both pix to have the same hw addresses?
If they are 2 separate auctions by 2 separate sellers, then one is probably running a scam
Hey, I don't see contexts in the license -- are these 7.x or greater? Or 6.x or lower?:mike: Cisco Certifications -- Collect the Entire Set! -
qplayed Member Posts: 303ahhhaha ok then this looks good I wasn't aware of that thanks mike! btw is this good enough for the lab ? I'm getting a wicked deal on theseIf you cannot express in a sentence or two what
you intend to get across, then it is not focused
well enough.
—Charles Osgood, TV commentator -
mikej412 Member Posts: 10,086 ■■■■■■■■■■qplayed wrote:is this good enough for the lab ? I'm getting a wicked deal on thesemikej412 wrote:Hey, I don't see contexts in the license -- are these 7.x or greater? Or 6.x or lower?:mike: Cisco Certifications -- Collect the Entire Set!
-
qplayed Member Posts: 303they are 6.3(3)...If i upgrade thee with 7.x code will i have any problems ?If you cannot express in a sentence or two what
you intend to get across, then it is not focused
well enough.
—Charles Osgood, TV commentator -
mikej412 Member Posts: 10,086 ■■■■■■■■■■qplayed wrote:they are 6.3(3)...If i upgrade thee with 7.x code will i have any problems ?:mike: Cisco Certifications -- Collect the Entire Set!
-
qplayed Member Posts: 303what's that going to costIf you cannot express in a sentence or two what
you intend to get across, then it is not focused
well enough.
—Charles Osgood, TV commentator -
qplayed Member Posts: 303mike,
once these have been upgraded....will they be ok for lab work since they are a FO pair?If you cannot express in a sentence or two what
you intend to get across, then it is not focused
well enough.
—Charles Osgood, TV commentator -
mikej412 Member Posts: 10,086 ■■■■■■■■■■I've heard different things...... and I get paid way to much to know how to do it. I just say "upgrade the PIXs" and wave my hand (or send an email) and it just seems to happen -- but I'm positive there's more to it than that, since there's usually a time lag between my declaration and the PIXs being upgraded.
I have made it to the Activation Key upgrade page with my Guest Level Cisco ID.... but I didn't have anything to upgrade to try it out.
They'll be great for a lab -- if you figure out the upgrade process (or someone else with actual experience chimes in) and you wind up with a pair of Unrestricted 7.x or 8.x PIXs with Failover capability (or the Unrestricted/FO Pair).:mike: Cisco Certifications -- Collect the Entire Set!