Got 70-220 but not 214
rcsnydley
Member Posts: 67 ■■□□□□□□□□
I got 220 but 214 was a b....
Maybe I should do Sec+ instead. I only need 1 more for my MCSE.
I hear Sec+ is hard. Harder than 214?
I got a 661 on the 214.
I guess I will probably do 214 eventually anyway, for my MCSE-Security.
Maybe I should do Sec+ instead. I only need 1 more for my MCSE.
I hear Sec+ is hard. Harder than 214?
I got a 661 on the 214.
I guess I will probably do 214 eventually anyway, for my MCSE-Security.
Comments
-
pandimus Member Posts: 651Waaaay harder than 214.. 214 was cake compared....
IMHOXinxing is the hairy one. -
rcsnydley Member Posts: 67 ■■□□□□□□□□So I guess if I can pass Sec+ then 214 should be a walk in the park?
I need both of them-if I don't do 227-for my MCSE-Sec. -
pandimus Member Posts: 651Well, as they are both security they are pretty different.. 214 seems to concentrate alot on security templates and the such. More micro-soft. tons of long questions.. I wouldnt compare the two.. IOW you do need to study for both of them.. If it was up to me /do it over again, i would get the security cert via all MS tests. But... The more i go think about it.. If you are looking to be more hireable of the bat. Check out the messenging one. Alot of employers seem to want people to know cisco and exchange.
$ .02Xinxing is the hairy one. -
rcsnydley Member Posts: 67 ■■□□□□□□□□Thanks for ypur $.02 I take a look at that. From what i hear I just may take 214 again and save Sec+ for another life or something.