nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Is Cuil cool?

LarryDaMan

From (some of) the makers of google...

www.cuil.com

Supposed to have some search advantages over google.

Anyone think it will catch on?

Find more posts tagged with

SAVE $250 on Your Boot Camp — Use Code "EXAM26"

Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026

View Boot Camps

Comments

undomiel

Slow, kind of ugly, doesn't have the simplicity that makes Google so attractive.

BeaverC32

Very slow...very bad first impression.

nicklauscombs

soooooooooo slow and it didn't provide me the links I was looking for

unclejohnny

Under the current version of this site, I have to give Cuil a thumbs down.

shednik

Yea i didn't like the performance of this site at all...

dynamik

At least it returned results for you guys. When I tried it, it returned no results

I think it's getting swamped from Digg, Slashdot, etc. It seems like they weren't ready for that kind of load.

snadam

dynamik wrote:

At least it returned results for you guys. When I tried it, it returned no results

I think it's getting swamped from Digg, Slashdot, etc. It seems like they weren't ready for that kind of load.

im still waiting for my results to show up from 5 minutes ago...

it is NOT getting much praise out there so far.

darknight

Cuil should be prounounced kill, cause thats what it done to my search...

GT-Rob

Search was quick for me, but I don't like the formatting. In IE it doesn't fit right maximized, and you are forced to keep their odd dimensions. Looks not ready.

Tyrant1919

Me searching simply "Techexams" does not point simply to Techexams.net like google or yahoo does. This will never ever touch google.

Slowhand

The only thing noteworthy about it was the tabbed results with suggested topics. Other than that, the output is rather ugly and the search was slow. Even if the search-speed is improved, one question remains: why would I use this in favor of Google, Yahoo, or any other search engine? What does it have that others don't?

RussS

Don't like the format at all.

I wouldn't however get worked up about the speed - something tells me that their site is being bombarded by search enquiries ..... many from google