Options
Zero Subnet
wbosher
Member Posts: 422
in CCNA & CCENT
I've read a lot of posts on the Zero Subnet but I'm just getting more and more confused. If the zero subnet can't be used, is this just the first subnet in the range? For example...
192.168.1.0/27 would mean the ranges are..
192.168.1.0 - 31
192.168.1.32 - 63
192.168.1..64 - 95
192.168.1..96 - 127....
Doest this mean the the range from 192.168.1.0 - 31 can't be used?
192.168.1.0/27 would mean the ranges are..
192.168.1.0 - 31
192.168.1.32 - 63
192.168.1..64 - 95
192.168.1..96 - 127....
Doest this mean the the range from 192.168.1.0 - 31 can't be used?
Comments
-
OptionsAlanJames Member Posts: 230The zero subnet can be used, you need to count it in cisco exams as well unless they state otherwise, which they normally don't
-
Optionswbosher Member Posts: 422I understand that they can be used unless otherwise specified. What I want to know is am I correct in saying that this first range is the zero subnet? I'm confused as to what exactly the zero subnet is.
-
Optionsiworms Member Posts: 53 ■■□□□□□□□□You're right, 192.168.1.0 -- 31 (/27) is subnet zero. This is because your subnet address is 192.168.1.0, which coincides with the class C network address 192.168.1.0. Other subnets don't have this problem.
Subnet zero is in reference to classful networks, so all you need is find the one subnet that has a subnet address identical to the classful network address. For example, 10.1.1.0/26 is not subnet zero, because the class A network address is 10.0.0.0, so 10.0.0.0/26 is subnet zero. -
Optionswbosher Member Posts: 422OK, I think I've got it. So using a class B example of 172.16.0.0/26, the zero subnet (assuming we can't use the zero subnet) would be 172.16.0.0 - 63 and would be unusable, but we could use 172.16.1.0 - 63. Am I right?
-
Optionsiworms Member Posts: 53 ■■□□□□□□□□Right, we can't use 172.16.0.0--63. For your /26 example, we can use 172.16.0.64--127 all the way up to 172.16.255.192--255.
Just for fun, 172.16.0.0/23: if subnet zero not allowed, then 172.16.0.0--172.16.1.255 cannot be used. The first valid range is 172.16.2.0--172.16.3.255. -
OptionsFunky_child Registered Users Posts: 1 ■□□□□□□□□□You're right, 192.168.1.0 -- 31 (/27) is subnet zero. This is because your subnet address is 192.168.1.0, which coincides with the class C network address 192.168.1.0. Other subnets don't have this problem.
Subnet zero is in reference to classful networks, so all you need is find the one subnet that has a subnet address identical to the classful network address. For example, 10.1.1.0/26 is not subnet zero, because the class A network address is 10.0.0.0, so 10.0.0.0/26 is subnet zero.
Does for address 192.168.2.0/28 the subnet-zero addressess going from 192.168.2.1 - 192.168.2.15 or from 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.15 ?
Does subnet - zero always starts from begin of class or?
thnx! -
Optionsthehourman Member Posts: 723If the command no ip subnet-zero is being used. Can use the broadcast address?Studying:
Working on CCNA: Security. Start date: 12.28.10
Microsoft 70-640 - on hold (This is not taking me anywhere. I started this in October, and it is December now, I am still on page 221. WTH!)
Reading:
Network Warrior - Currently at Part II
Reading IPv6 Essentials 2nd Edition - on hold -
Optionsfly351 Member Posts: 360thehourman wrote: »If the command no ip subnet-zero is being used. Can use the broadcast address?
Your question isn't very clearCCNP :study: -
Optionsblackninja Member Posts: 385Before Cisco introduced the Subnet Zero command, you would lose the first and last subnets, just like you would when you -2 for the hosts (network & broadcast addresses)
E.G.
Without Subnet Zero command:
192.168.0.0 /28
192.168.0.0 - 15 - CAN'T USE
192.168.0.16 - 31
192.168.0.32 - 47
.
.
192.168.0.224 - 239
192.168.0.240 - 255 - CAN'T USE
With Subnet Zero command:
192.168.0.0 /28
192.168.0.0 - 15 - CAN USE
192.168.0.16 - 31
192.168.0.32 - 47
.
.
192.168.0.224 - 239
192.168.0.240 - 255 - CAN USECurrently studying:
CCIE R&S - using INE workbooks & videos
Currently reading:
Everything. Twice -
Optionsthehourman Member Posts: 723blackninja wrote: »Before Cisco introduced the Subnet Zero command, you would lose the first and last subnets, just like you would when you -2 for the hosts (network & broadcast addresses)
E.G.
Without Subnet Zero command:
192.168.0.0 /28
192.168.0.0 - 15 - CAN'T USE
192.168.0.16 - 31
192.168.0.32 - 47
.
.
192.168.0.224 - 239
192.168.0.240 - 255 - CAN'T USE
With Subnet Zero command:
192.168.0.0 /28
192.168.0.0 - 15 - CAN USE
192.168.0.16 - 31
192.168.0.32 - 47
.
.
192.168.0.224 - 239
192.168.0.240 - 255 - CAN USEStudying:
Working on CCNA: Security. Start date: 12.28.10
Microsoft 70-640 - on hold (This is not taking me anywhere. I started this in October, and it is December now, I am still on page 221. WTH!)
Reading:
Network Warrior - Currently at Part II
Reading IPv6 Essentials 2nd Edition - on hold