Multiprocessor BSOD ? That is a weird one

jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
One Server with 1x5410 Xeon (Quad Core) ..

Installed Windows Server 2008 Web x64 just fine .. Shutdown - put in a 2nd CPU - boot up :

Bluescreen :

upime.jpg

Yes, both CPUs are identical .. I am wondering .. As the CPU is a quadcore - it should have installed the multi processor kernel anyway .. so why the heck throws it a blue screen when inserting a second CPU icon_sad.gif

I will now try to install it with both CPUs - which will probably work .. but this is just weird weird weird ...
My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p

Comments

  • astorrsastorrs Member Posts: 3,139 ■■■■■■□□□□
    Weird, I would pull one CPU, boot it up and check which HAL it's using and force it to use the SMP one.
  • jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
    Now tried installing the OS using both CPUs and same problem ..

    Will have to check with CPUz whether both CPUs maybe do have a difference I don't see .. for crying out loud icon_sad.gif
    My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p
  • jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
    Aww man, this is painful ..

    We have a bucket full of 5410 CPUs .. now check this out :

    2r60020.jpg

    See the stepping icon_sad.gif

    Same batch .. different stepping .. no wonder it goes boom .. Now the fun part : finding two identical CPUs
    My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p
  • astorrsastorrs Member Posts: 3,139 ■■■■■■□□□□
    Stupid, otherwise identical. Sigh. Good luck.
  • dynamikdynamik Banned Posts: 12,312 ■■■■■■■■■□
    Wow.. that's crazy icon_eek.gif
  • tierstentiersten Member Posts: 4,505
    It isn't complaining about the stepping. MXCSR on the SSE unit on the two CPUs differ.
  • jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
    Interesting enough, both CPUs from the above server have a different block of serials ..

    On Xeon CPUs you normally have two lines .. first line is always identical (I guess some sort of batch number) but in this case it wasn't ...

    Now the problem with stuff like this : If you every want to upgrade a server to a dual processor in the future (it will use the correct HAL anyway since Xeons are multicores) you have to hope its the same batch .. if not .. hope you have another matched pair from one identical batch and swap both ...

    Considering we have hundreds of server this could be fun icon_sad.gif

    I haven't seen this on Server 2003 yet - or maybe we were just lucky ... more testing needed I suppose ...
    My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p
  • jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
    tiersten wrote:
    It isn't complaining about the stepping. MXCSR on the SSE unit on the two CPUs differ.

    I see I forgot to add the "interesting" column :)

    http://i33.tinypic.com/rtg3zt.jpg

    So Core Stepping is indeed different (not SSE ?)
    My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p
  • tierstentiersten Member Posts: 4,505
    Gomjaba wrote:
    tiersten wrote:
    It isn't complaining about the stepping. MXCSR on the SSE unit on the two CPUs differ.

    I see I forgot to add the "interesting" column :)

    http://i33.tinypic.com/rtg3zt.jpg

    So Core Stepping is indeed different (not SSE ?)
    I know that the stepping is different. I'm just saying that MXCSR is what the bugcheck is complaining about. You can run Windows SMP with different steppings of a CPU. Decoding bugcheck 0x0000003E.
    Mixing processors of different steppings but the same model (as per CPUID instruction) is supported.

    Datasheet link

    [edit]Added datasheet info[/edit]
  • tierstentiersten Member Posts: 4,505
    Decoding the values given don't make sense if it is a MXCSR register however. Check with whoever manufactures your motherboard to see if there are any firmware updates and also ask Microsoft support.

    We just order the correct parts from IBM or HP. If it doesn't work then we just shout at them until they fix it.
Sign In or Register to comment.