Subnetting
DerekAustin26
Member Posts: 275
in CCNA & CCENT
Okay, I've read so much about Subnetting.
Everywhere you read, IP Addresses between 128 & 192 = Class B Subnet
At work we have this Network Diagram. One of the Core Layer 3 Switches has an IP of 149.187.15.3 & subnet of 255.255.255.0
This is just a Class B IP using a Class C Subnetting Scheme correct?
Just like you can have a Class A IP that can use a Class B or C Subnetting Scheme.
I believe the Subnets would range from 255.255.0.0 - 255.255.255.254
The block is 1 which is in the 3rd octet - 255.255.X.0
Let me know if this looks correct?
Thanks,
Everywhere you read, IP Addresses between 128 & 192 = Class B Subnet
At work we have this Network Diagram. One of the Core Layer 3 Switches has an IP of 149.187.15.3 & subnet of 255.255.255.0
This is just a Class B IP using a Class C Subnetting Scheme correct?
Just like you can have a Class A IP that can use a Class B or C Subnetting Scheme.
I believe the Subnets would range from 255.255.0.0 - 255.255.255.254
The block is 1 which is in the 3rd octet - 255.255.X.0
Let me know if this looks correct?
Thanks,
Comments
-
dynamik Banned Posts: 12,312 ■■■■■■■■■□Subnetting breaks larger networks into smaller networks, so yes, that is correct.
-
blackninja Member Posts: 385DerekAustin26 wrote: »Okay, I've read so much about Subnetting.
Everywhere you read, IP Addresses between 128 & 192 = Class B Subnet
At work we have this Network Diagram. One of the Core Layer 3 Switches has an IP of 149.187.15.3 & subnet of 255.255.255.0
This is just a Class B IP using a Class C Subnetting Scheme correct?
Just like you can have a Class A IP that can use a Class B or C Subnetting Scheme.
I believe the Subnets would range from 255.255.0.0 - 255.255.255.254
The block is 1 which is in the 3rd octet - 255.255.X.0
Let me know if this looks correct?
Thanks,
Take a look at Learn To Subnet: A Free, Lecture-Based Presentation on IP Addressing and SubnettingCurrently studying:
CCIE R&S - using INE workbooks & videos
Currently reading:
Everything. Twice -
DerekAustin26 Member Posts: 275Thanks Dynamik.
Blackninja, I've already been there.. I'm just asking if it looks correct or not.
I'm pretty confident it's correct. I've studied Subnetting pretty intensively. -
blackninja Member Posts: 385DerekAustin26 wrote: »
I'm pretty confident it's correct. I've studied Subnetting pretty intensively.
For the record the subnets would be:
149.187.0.0 - 149.187.255.255 /24
256 subnets with 254 valid hosts per subnetCurrently studying:
CCIE R&S - using INE workbooks & videos
Currently reading:
Everything. Twice -
DerekAustin26 Member Posts: 275blackninja wrote: »For the record the subnets would be:
149.187.0.0 - 149.187.255.255 /24
256 subnets with 254 valid hosts per subnet
yes of course, My bad, I dont know why i put "255.255.0.0" & "255.255.255.254"
My fingers went into auto-pilot on the "255's"
So yes, u caught me
Thanks for noticing