Using IGRP
Danh
Member Posts: 59 ■■□□□□□□□□
in CCNA & CCENT
I used RIP sucessfully up to this point. Want to try IGRP.
Do I add IGRP the same as RIP? Like this:
router igrp 10
network 172.16.0.0
network 172.16.1.0
Do I enter the networks directly connected just like I would in RIP? Or is it a different process
Thanks
Do I add IGRP the same as RIP? Like this:
router igrp 10
network 172.16.0.0
network 172.16.1.0
Do I enter the networks directly connected just like I would in RIP? Or is it a different process
Thanks
Comments
-
amod_pandya Member Posts: 33 ■■□□□□□□□□well directly connected networks dont require a routing protocol to be identified, remember they are denoted with a "C" in the routing table?
But otherwise yes the basic configuration is identical for RIP and IGRP except for the ASN.
hope it helps.:: PEACE :: -
Webmaster Admin Posts: 10,292 Adminamod_pandya wrote:well directly connected networks dont require a routing protocol to be identified, remember they are denoted with a "C" in the routing table?
@Danh: Setting up RIP and IGRP is indeed very similar. The main difference in 'starting the IGRP routing process' and starting up RIP is that IGRP requires the AS number.
Click here for more detailed information about setting up and configuring IGRP. -
amod_pandya Member Posts: 33 ■■□□□□□□□□i thought the poster was asking something else...i thought he was asking about detection....got confused with the question!!:: PEACE ::
-
Danh Member Posts: 59 ■■□□□□□□□□Another quick question.
IGRP uses classful routing and is not capable of classless routing right? -
Webmaster Admin Posts: 10,292 AdminIndeed, IGRP it is classful and does not include the subnet mask in updates, hence no VLSM possible.
-
schneeman Member Posts: 14 ■□□□□□□□□□Danh wrote:I used RIP sucessfully up to this point. Want to try IGRP.
Do I add IGRP the same as RIP? Like this:
router igrp 10
network 172.16.0.0
network 172.16.1.0
Do I enter the networks directly connected just like I would in RIP? Or is it a different process
Thanks
Please lookt at Sybex 2004 page 238.There is a very special warning and note there about this subject.