RSTP & Trunk Ports

sixarmsixarm Member Posts: 17 ■□□□□□□□□□
First of all, let me describe my topology...I have three 2950's connected in a 'triangle' format [SW1 (root bridge), SW2 & SW3] with a Cisco 2611XM hanging off SW3 as a router-on-a-stick. My test PC was connected via SW2. I have three extra VLAN's configured, each with a corresponding sub-interface on the 2600.

I have configured all three switches to use RSTP and the root bridge is set the same across all VLAN's. I have enabled spanning-tree fastport on the interface that my PC connects to and also the trunked interface to the 2600.

Now, this is the test that I was doing in order to see the difference between STP & RSTP. My PC was configured in one of the VLAN's and I was running a constant ping across to the sub-interface on the 2600. I then disabled the interface on SW1 to SW3, forcing STP to open the link from SW2 to SW3. I expected to see a seamless fail over, however there wasn't really a difference from when I previously tested using basic STP.

In order to troubleshoot the issue I returned the interface on SW2 that my PC connects to back to the native VLAN, removed all the sub-interfaces on the 2600 and configured the interface on SW3 connecting to the 2600 to access mode instead of trunk.

On retesting there was no pings dropped when I shut the interface on SW1 and then only 1 dropped when I opened it again. Now this is what I'd expect from RSTP.

Am I missing some config here that would cause this?

Thanks in advance.

Comments

  • sixarmsixarm Member Posts: 17 ■□□□□□□□□□
  • /usr/usr Member Posts: 1,768 ■■■□□□□□□□
    Are you saying that RSTP was acting the same as STP when you were routing between VLANs, but after you removed the VLANs and subinterfaces, everything worked as expected?

    I'm a bit confused by your scenario.
  • sixarmsixarm Member Posts: 17 ■□□□□□□□□□
    /usr wrote: »
    Are you saying that RSTP was acting the same as STP when you were routing between VLANs, but after you removed the VLANs and subinterfaces, everything worked as expected?

    I'm a bit confused by your scenario.
    Yep, that's exactly what happened.
  • ptlinvaptlinva Member Posts: 125
    It's pretty cool to see so many people working on the same things that you are..

    I tried your scenario but ran into problems because one of my switches was a CatOS switch - 2948 -and I'm having issues troubleshooting with it.

    I'll should have my third 2950 delivered today and a 4th switch (3550) here by Thursday. I purchased these do test this exact scenario.

    You'll here back from me shortly with the results...

    Good Luck SixArm!
  • sixarmsixarm Member Posts: 17 ■□□□□□□□□□
    I'd be very interested to hear how you get on. :)

    I'm tempted to wipe all my switch configs and start again to see if this makes any difference.
  • /usr/usr Member Posts: 1,768 ■■■□□□□□□□
    I will try this when I get home tonight or tomorrow. I've got a 2620XM setup with subinterfaces and VLANS, like you described, so I won't have to do much work to replicate your scenario.
  • sixarmsixarm Member Posts: 17 ■□□□□□□□□□
    Did either of you manage to test out this scenario?

    My PC won't boot at the moment, so I've not been able to have a play with my Cisco's for the past few days. Bloody Windows. crash.gif
  • ikarugamattikarugamatt Member Posts: 1 ■□□□□□□□□□
    If you can post up your port switch config that may help to troubleshoot it. It sounds like you've got spanning-tree portfast enabled and spanning-tree mode rapid-pvst (I think that's the right one) as well but config will always help things further.

    :D
Sign In or Register to comment.