Subnet/Switch Clarification
up2thetime
Member Posts: 154
in CCNA & CCENT
Hey I was wondering if someone could please clear something up.
I was having a debate at school with a friend of mine about subnetting and broadcasts.
Firstly, if we have an address of 192.168.1.0 and Subnet Mask of 255.255.255.252, it is my understanding that:
192.168.1.0 is the Network ID
192.168.1.1 is a valid Host Address
192.168.1.2 is a valid Host Address
192.168.1.3 is the Broadcast address and cannot be assigned to a host.
According to my friend, 192.168.1.3 is a valid host address.
Is he correct?
Secondly, it is my understanding that a switch (assume it’s a Layer 2 switch with no VLANs configured) breaks up collisions domains. However all hosts connected to that switch are on the same Broadcast domain and will therefore receive broadcast messages. According to my friend, switches will not propagate a broadcast.
Is he correct?
Thank you.
I was having a debate at school with a friend of mine about subnetting and broadcasts.
Firstly, if we have an address of 192.168.1.0 and Subnet Mask of 255.255.255.252, it is my understanding that:
192.168.1.0 is the Network ID
192.168.1.1 is a valid Host Address
192.168.1.2 is a valid Host Address
192.168.1.3 is the Broadcast address and cannot be assigned to a host.
According to my friend, 192.168.1.3 is a valid host address.
Is he correct?
Secondly, it is my understanding that a switch (assume it’s a Layer 2 switch with no VLANs configured) breaks up collisions domains. However all hosts connected to that switch are on the same Broadcast domain and will therefore receive broadcast messages. According to my friend, switches will not propagate a broadcast.
Is he correct?
Thank you.
Comments
-
dynamik Banned Posts: 12,312 ■■■■■■■■■□It sounds like your friend has a case of the dumb
Have him try to configure a NIC with those settings in Windows if he doesn't believe you (it will yell at him).
Edit: It's like Mike and I, one of us is a little slow... -
mikej412 Member Posts: 10,086 ■■■■■■■■■■up2thetime wrote: »I was having a debate at school with a friend of mine:mike: Cisco Certifications -- Collect the Entire Set!
-
Bert McGert Member Posts: 122Sir, according to my calculations, your friend is absolutely correct.
Stick with him, he knows what he's talking about. -
Slowhand Mod Posts: 5,161 ModBert McGert wrote: »Sir, according to my calculations, your friend is absolutely correct.
Stick with him, he knows what he's talking about.
And if you believe that, I've got a big, red bridge in San Francisco to sell you.up2thetime wrote: »Secondly, it is my understanding that a switch (assume it’s a Layer 2 switch with no VLANs configured) breaks up collisions domains. However all hosts connected to that switch are on the same Broadcast domain and will therefore receive broadcast messages. According to my friend, switches will not propagate a broadcast.
Is he correct?
Thank you.
Free Microsoft Training: Microsoft Learn
Free PowerShell Resources: Top PowerShell Blogs
Free DevOps/Azure Resources: Visual Studio Dev Essentials
Let it never be said that I didn't do the very least I could do. -
blackninja Member Posts: 385Bert McGert wrote: »Sir, according to my calculations, your friend is absolutely correct.
Stick with him, he knows what he's talking about.
I'll not be using any sarcasm today
Subnets are:
192.168.1.0
192.168.1.4
192.168.1.8
192.168.1.3 is the Broadcast address and cannot be assigned to a host.
So how can 192.168.1.3 be a valid host?
Have you been drinking?Currently studying:
CCIE R&S - using INE workbooks & videos
Currently reading:
Everything. Twice -
mikej412 Member Posts: 10,086 ■■■■■■■■■■Bert McGert wrote: »Stick with him, he knows what he's talking about.
Ooooh..... to the original poster: are you both applying for the same Internship position somewhere? That could explain "your friend" and his "answers.":mike: Cisco Certifications -- Collect the Entire Set! -
up2thetime Member Posts: 154Are you "the friend?"
Ooooh..... to the original poster: are you both applying for the same Internship position somewhere? That could explain "your friend" and his "answers."
LOL!!
No no, we were just in class and got on the topic of subnetting, which turned into a long argument about broadcast addresses and switches.
I was pretty sure that I was correct. Just wanted to confirm with the experts