skrpune wrote: » I'd liken Server+ to A+.
lespaulman74 wrote: » ...Question is: - what is the difference between the Network+ and Server+ exams. Which one is "higher"?
lespaulman74 wrote: » Hi All, Im an experienced Network Admin (6yrs) and Im just not getting some certifications since my hours have been cut Question is: - what is the difference between the Network+ and Server+ exams. Which one is "higher"? Im assuming the server+ exam is higher up, since its actually applied network principles. Thx
skrpune wrote: » They're different animals, in my opinion. I took Network+ last year, and I found it to be a larger volume of material than Server+ but not necessarily harder or easier by design. I don't think that Server+ is higher...if I had to pick, I'd say that Network+ is probably more difficult for a couple reasons - much wider array of topics and hence more things you have to know how to troubleshoot. I'd liken Server+ to A+. (DISCLAIMER: do take all that with a grain of salt...I just took the Server+ beta exam so I have no idea how I did yet, and this is all just my opinion.)
bigmantenor wrote: » Holy necro thread Batman!
asoft wrote: » Server+ is suitable if you want to take systems administration path, and Network+ is suitable if you want to take network administration path.
burfect wrote: » Old thread but wanted to bump for this post... I really have no interest in the future in the networking path, my focus/goal is towards system administration/virtualization/servers so I would assume a good place to start would be Server+? Although involved to a slight degree, I talk to SA's and VCPs all day, all who seem to have no real knowledge of networking outside the basics. Maybe study for Network+ but skip the actual test? I am thinking off the top of my head the tests actually worth taking (ie paying money for) would be MCSA/Server+/Security+ from the getgo as security seems to be a pressing issue no matter which path/vertical your in. Maybe the A+ just for resume purposes?