What's your opinion about this approach?
I am trying to change careers. My first step into that was studying and finally getting the CCNA. A few months later (a year actually!) I got the CCNA Voice and Im now studying for the CCNP.
I have submitted my resume to severl places (last week) and havent been called yet, but I think I will eventually. I had a conversation with the Senior DBA of the second TELCO of the country, and he suggested that for my short term goal (start working ASAP), a different approach to training and studuying was necessary. He told me that getting "certification prepared" takes way more time than simply being prepared to work with the tecnologies and have some exposure to it...I totally agree with him, the thing here is that one really needs to master a lot of topics in a manner that is not precisely necessary in the real world. Ok. That mmight have sounded not the way I meant it...
Another way to say it: The theory we need to know and master in order to get certified is, most of the time, way more than what it is required for most jobs. I think that one came out a lot better.
Here in Dominican Republic the job market for Cisco guys is not that big,but the Cisco "p Level" pros are not that many neither. Basically, getting a CCNP is apparently a very good way to enter thee field with a good paying job (is there a place in the world where it isnt?), but it takes a lot of time to get the CCNP, and that is why he suggested that I had to start getting some classes and learning a lot of materials, specially Microsoft technologies. Notice he mentioned courses and classes, he asked me to forget about certifications for a few months and focus on learning several technologies, based on the certification programs but not getting prepared for certification. We talked about CBTNuggets, TrainSignal and TestOut, and he suggested that I should get a few of those courses, view them, study, learn the material and then put the courses in the resume.
What i like about this new approach is that I feel I will be able to learn a lot of stuff in a few months, in much less time, now that Im unemployed. I passed the CCNA Voice 2 weeks ago and I felt I was ready for the exam more than 6 weeks ago, until I took a preparation exam and failed miserably. In those 4 weeks, i didnt learn a new thing, not a new configuration (well, not truth because I downloaded a lot of documents from cisco.com and definitely went beyond IIUC material) but I basically spent 4weeks and crazy hours trying to REALLY learn a lot of terminology and theory. That time could have been spent learning the ccna wireless material... or something else...
Do you think that it would be better to go this way, and list "Trainsignal Windows server 2008 Active Directory configuration (exam 83-640) course" kind of thing in the resume instead of the certiifications? I am not asking if you think it would be better to list the training alone instead of certifications, Im asking if you think it is better to have SEVERAL of that kind of courses instead of say, one certification.
My estimates are that I could complete around 4 courses or more in the time I need to actually pass one exam. I think I could learn all 3 courses of the MCITP: SA (not to "certification level") in the time I need to actually learn the 83-640 and pass the exam.
Remember Im a career changer and that I dont have any relevant experience in ANY current technology. Would it be better to be MCTS: active directory, configuring or learning the whole MCITP: SA and listing the associated courses in the resumes?
Sorry for the huge post...