JDMurray wrote: » Salaries may be climbing slightly, but hiring has slowed and security people are not immune to lay-offs.
Turgon wrote: » It's hot and a lot of people are trying to get in on it.
dynamik wrote: » turgon wrote: It's hot and a lot of people are trying to get in on it. How did this thread become about my mom?
turgon wrote: It's hot and a lot of people are trying to get in on it.
Turgon wrote: » It's hot and a lot of people are trying to get in on it. But as the cost of security rises so will attempts to keep the costs down. A lot of people trying to get in on security underestimate the effort required to get on and the kind of work involved. A lot of paperwork in many roles and on the technical side it can take years and a lot of effort to accumulate the specialist skills. Some folks seem to think it's mostly pen testing. Running pentests isn't difficult, knowing what to test and interpreting the results in a useful way is quite another.
eMeS wrote: » The system said I couldn't give you rep for this, but I would if I could. More people need to have an honest and serious view of security as a career such as what Turgon has stated here. Usually when something sounds "cool" it will attract a lot of people. MS
dynamik wrote: » How did this thread become about my mom?
tpatt100 wrote: » Amen to the paperwork. People think security is all high speed technical stuff. Once you hit the enterprise level its 50 percent administrative Visio/Project/Excel. Keeping track of vulnerabilities, organizing patch schedules, exceptions for patches due to software conflicts, etc, etc. Anybody can pick up the techy stuff, keeping track of the b.s. due to external audits is a huge part of security.