Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
NetworkingStudent wrote: » When concerning outsourcing, why is it that a majority of companies choose India for IT based jobs? How come they don’t choose other countries such as: Africa, Ethiopia, or Russia? I’m just curious because it seems like 90% or more of the off shoring/outsourcing of IT jobs seems to be India based workers. I want to know for my own personal knowledge. I know that by going to other countries that you can save a ton of money, because you can pay the workers a lot less; however, I’m looking for specific reasons as to why they chose India. Why do they choose India for IT outsourcing? Where do the India workers get their training and education? Does the India and Untied States government play a big role in the number of India based IT workers?
Hyper-Me wrote: » Thank god for langauge barriers or none of us would have a job. Honestly, I've never dealt with anyone that was overseas that actually knew what the hell they were doing, but because they did it for pennies on the dollar it took a job away from someone here in the states. We have a bum HP Printer once that was flat out DOA. We spent over 12 hours on the phone with support in India before they finally agreed to send a replacement. That only happened because I asked for supervisor after supervisor and was getting short with them after about hour 11.
dynamik wrote: » Have you used them for any serious problems or just miscellaneous bs like printer problems? I used one of my Technet support calls to Microsoft about five years ago, and the guy I got was a command-line ninja. I was very impressed.
chrisone wrote: » Although it is changing now but the idea is this... Greedy corporations dont care about their employees. Stingy corporations dont care about Americans/America. Evil corporations dont care about your cost of living and would rather hire Indians in poorer countries and pay them half of what you earn because they would live like kings in their country because the dollar is much hire. One more BACK Hand Obama needs to put down on some of these UN-American companies!
Forsaken_GA wrote: » Commandline pirate would be more appropriate.
dynamik wrote: » I can't give you more rep until I "spread it around" a bit, so I'll just give you props here
Hyper-Me wrote: » Thank god for langauge barriers or none of us would have a job. Honestly, I've never dealt with anyone that was overseas that actually knew what the hell they were doing, but because they did it for pennies on the dollar it took a job away from someone here in the states.
MYSTYKRACER wrote: » OOOOHHH, NO YOU DIDN'!!!!! Don't you know it's unAmerican to agree w/ anything Obama says or does, and/or criticize anything a large corporation says or does?! You do know the Supreme Court just ruled that corporations are people too and they have feelings! . . . but seriously, yeah been there, done that!
chrisone wrote: » YES WE DID! hahaha Im all for corporations and i believe big business provides jobs. Heck im a conservative / republican too. However I voted for Obama and i understood he was the better man to help rebuild this country. I just believe in order for our country to be great like it once was, we cannot be one side blinded anymore. In reality we need to be conservative in some situations/topics and liberal in some situations/topics. Corporate greed and illegal practices are so disgusting and its destroying our country.
eMeS wrote: » Labor, regardless of the industry, always moves to where the lowest cost can be paid for the highest quality. I wouldn't say that 90% goes to India; and there is significant outsourcing to Russia/CIS over the past 15 years. I would argue that in the case of India, outsourcing has somewhat failed. In my experience there are some very good smart people over there, however, on the whole I have seen great dissatisfaction with outsourcing to India. Also keep in mind that many Indians would rather (and do) live in the US. During my time in this field, the first outsourcing location was Ireland. A lot of development activity moved there in the early 90's. The next was significant outsourcing to Russia and then India. The reason is I think the same. You have a surplus of highly educated people in all of those locations who are willing to work for much less than Americans that might be even have less education. You also have largely stable governments that give incentives to companies that move jobs to their countries. This lowers the overall transaction cost for the companies, and so they move jobs. Why not Africa? (Or for that matter, why not South America?). Africa for the most part has non-functioning governmental structures. There are some exceptions, however the bulk of Africa doesn't work well from a perspective of government. In Africa, to get business done, there are always lots of random taxes and kickbacks that make things happen. When this is the case, it increases the cost for organizations, and they don't move jobs there. Also in Africa you have a population of people that are largely uneducated compared to other parts of the world. In South America you have much the same situation; a largely uneducated population and high transaction costs in the forms of kickbacks and graft because of non-functioning governments. IMO, some outsourcing activities work and work well; Ireland being an excellent example. Others look good on paper, look good in the short-term, but overall result in increased costs; India being the best example I can think of there. Also IMO, outsourcing, when it works well is not a bad thing. It turns simple routine jobs into commodities, and lets smart, well-educated and innovative Americans work towards making the next innovation. MS
HeroPsycho wrote: » You have to understand it's not that they're overseas that explains why they suck. It's because the company chose to save costs over providing quality support for their products. At that point, it could have been in the US or India or any place else. The support was gonna suck once they decided it was okay to suck as long as they saved money. I've worked with overseas personnel who could kick my butt, and I've worked with people here in the US who were the most useless sacks of crap I've ever worked with. The company's priorities shine through regardless of the nationalities of the employees.
Forsaken_GA wrote: » You call this last year rebuilding the country? Sure, the current state of the economy is a very large gorilla that Obama inherited, but rather than correct the mistakes of the previous administration, he's helped propagate them. Instead, we've gotten a government that's grown even more intrusive into the working of society. The party labels are meaningless, both of them will do the exact same thing, it's just a matter of where they get their money. I think this November's congressional elections will reveal a widespread indictment of the Obama administration. Ted Kennedy's seat changing over to a Republican in the midst of the health care debacle that Ted Kennedy helped foster is a pretty good singal that at least the folks of Massachusetts are willing to express their displeasure.
HeroPsycho wrote: » Sorry, hate to get a political flame war started, but I have to comment. First off, I'm a political moderate. I do not believe leftist or rightest philosophies, or any pure political philosophy works in their purest forms. Every philosophy has a weakness. Now, in respect to Obama making the economy worse, I'm gonna assume this is speaking to running up a larger deficit than what the previous administration was doing. Please, PLEASE, study a bit about Keynesian economics before blasting any administration for deficit spending. The difference between the Obama and Bush administrations is Obama is running the deficit up during a recession, and not just any recession, but the biggest recession since the Great Depression. He MUST deficit spend to get the economy going again. He has no choice. The vast majority of economists who are not politically involved agree about this. Bush on the other hand ran at the time record deficits during one of the fastest economic growth periods in American history fueled by a bubble that many economists saw coming, although underestimated greatly how badly the bubble was inflated. You can't do that, period. Most economists agree there, too. Believing a deficit is always bad is a nice simple way to view economics, but it's simply not true. You must run deficits to get out of most recessions, and surpluses during periods of growth, especially when the growth is fueled by bubbles to prevent the bubbles from inflating and to pay for the deficits you must run during recessions. Secondly, about the late Kennedy's seat being lost to a Republican, could it be that the reason Brown won was because the Democrat ran an absolutely craptastic campaign? Thirdly, please explain how under the Obama administration that government is more involved in society than before in any appreciable manner. So far from what I've seen, not much has been done by the Obama administration other than the economic stimulus and some credit card reform. There's plenty to critique about the Obama administration, or both parties in general for that matter, but Obama isn't worsening the economy, and he's not making the government more obtrusive in our lives.
HeroPsycho wrote: » I've worked with overseas personnel who could kick my butt...
HeroPsycho wrote: » ...and I've worked with people here in the US who were the most useless sacks of crap I've ever worked with.
HeroPsycho wrote: » It's because the company chose to save costs over providing quality support for their products.
eMeS wrote: » The thing is, for most executives that make these types of decisions it's almost always someone elses' problem in 5 to 7 years.... MS
Forsaken_GA wrote: » Heh, yeah, you'd think that instead of golden parachuting executives so that they're in a constant revolving door scenario, that some company would figure the best way to deal with an executive who screws up is to make him stay and fix his mess.
The savings are listed under the title, "Wins for Toyota -- Safety Group." The document cites millions of dollars in other savings by delaying safety regulations, avoiding defect investigations and slowing down other industry requirements.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.