Dose PT5 support VTP ?

Hi All,
This my network

And this sh vlan bri of switch 1 (VTP Server)

Switch#sh vlan brief
VLAN Name Status Ports
----

1 default active Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4, Fa0/5
Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8, Fa0/9
Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12, Fa0/13
Fa0/14, Fa0/15, Fa0/16, Fa0/17
Fa0/18, Fa0/19, Fa0/20, Fa0/21
Fa0/22, Fa0/23, Fa0/24, Gig1/1
Gig1/2
2 2 active
3 3 active
1002 fddi-default active
1003 token-ring-default active
1004 fddinet-default active
1005 trnet-default active

And this sh vtp status

Switch#sh vtp status
VTP Version : 2
Configuration Revision : 0
Maximum VLANs supported locally : 255
Number of existing VLANs : 7
VTP Operating Mode : Server
VTP Domain Name : CCNA
VTP Pruning Mode : Disabled
VTP V2 Mode : Disabled
VTP Traps Generation : Disabled
MD5 digest : 0x5E 0xCB 0xEE 0x42 0x8D 0x7B 0xE7 0x60
Configuration last modified by 0.0.0.0 at 3-1-93 00:02:36
Local updater ID is 1.1.1.1 on interface Vl1 (lowest numbered VLAN interface found)

Now,This is sh vlan of switch 2 (VTP Client)

Switch#show vlan brief
VLAN Name Status Ports
----

1 default active Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4, Fa0/5
Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8, Fa0/9
Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12, Fa0/13
Fa0/14, Fa0/15, Fa0/16, Fa0/17
Fa0/18, Fa0/19, Fa0/20, Fa0/21
Fa0/22, Fa0/23, Fa0/24, Gig1/1
Gig1/2
1002 fddi-default active
1003 token-ring-default active
1004 fddinet-default active
1005 trnet-default active

And this is sh vtp status

Switch#show vtp status
VTP Version : 2
Configuration Revision : 0
Maximum VLANs supported locally : 255
Number of existing VLANs : 5
VTP Operating Mode : Client
VTP Domain Name : CCNA
VTP Pruning Mode : Disabled
VTP V2 Mode : Disabled
VTP Traps Generation : Disabled
MD5 digest : 0xB8 0x97 0x2F 0xFE 0xA9 0x9D 0x7E 0xFC
Configuration last modified by 0.0.0.0 at 0-0-00 00:00:00

If PT5 support VTP,Why switch 2 dost not update VLANs(which I named it 2 and 3) from switch 1?

Find more posts tagged with

Free for TechExams community: Cybersecurity salary guide

Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move

Button

Comments

thenjduke

sniper_here wrote: »

Hi All,
This my network

And this sh vlan bri of switch 1 (VTP Server)

Switch#sh vlan brief
VLAN Name Status Ports
----
1 default active Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4, Fa0/5
Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8, Fa0/9
Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12, Fa0/13
Fa0/14, Fa0/15, Fa0/16, Fa0/17
Fa0/18, Fa0/19, Fa0/20, Fa0/21
Fa0/22, Fa0/23, Fa0/24, Gig1/1
Gig1/2
2 2 active
3 3 active
1002 fddi-default active
1003 token-ring-default active
1004 fddinet-default active
1005 trnet-default active

And this sh vtp status

Switch#sh vtp status
VTP Version : 2
Configuration Revision : 0
Maximum VLANs supported locally : 255
Number of existing VLANs : 7
VTP Operating Mode : Server
VTP Domain Name : CCNA
VTP Pruning Mode : Disabled
VTP V2 Mode : Disabled
VTP Traps Generation : Disabled
MD5 digest : 0x5E 0xCB 0xEE 0x42 0x8D 0x7B 0xE7 0x60
Configuration last modified by 0.0.0.0 at 3-1-93 00:02:36
Local updater ID is 1.1.1.1 on interface Vl1 (lowest numbered VLAN interface found)

Now,This is sh vlan of switch 2 (VTP Client)

Switch#show vlan brief
VLAN Name Status Ports
----
1 default active Fa0/2, Fa0/3, Fa0/4, Fa0/5
Fa0/6, Fa0/7, Fa0/8, Fa0/9
Fa0/10, Fa0/11, Fa0/12, Fa0/13
Fa0/14, Fa0/15, Fa0/16, Fa0/17
Fa0/18, Fa0/19, Fa0/20, Fa0/21
Fa0/22, Fa0/23, Fa0/24, Gig1/1
Gig1/2
1002 fddi-default active
1003 token-ring-default active
1004 fddinet-default active
1005 trnet-default active

And this is sh vtp status

Switch#show vtp status
VTP Version : 2
Configuration Revision : 0
Maximum VLANs supported locally : 255
Number of existing VLANs : 5
VTP Operating Mode : Client
VTP Domain Name : CCNA
VTP Pruning Mode : Disabled
VTP V2 Mode : Disabled
VTP Traps Generation : Disabled
MD5 digest : 0xB8 0x97 0x2F 0xFE 0xA9 0x9D 0x7E 0xFC
Configuration last modified by 0.0.0.0 at 0-0-00 00:00:00

If PT5 support VTP,Why switch 2 dost not update VLANs(which I named it 2 and 3) from switch 1?

Few things to look at:
Trunk ports setup correctly? switchport mode trunk on interface
Do you have the correct trunking protocols setup? switchport truck encapsulation ?

thenjduke

show int trunk for us and display results and post running config

hexem

I just tested within packet tracer 5.2.

Any vlan's created before they were both in the same vtp domain will not be propergated until you add at least another vlan, then all vlan's will be advertised.

By the look's of it he has the trunk, as int f0/1 is missing from vlan brief.

captobvious

Passwords different?

switch 1 - MD5 digest : 0x5E 0xCB 0xEE 0x42 0x8D 0x7B 0xE7 0x60
switch 2 - MD5 digest : 0xB8 0x97 0x2F 0xFE 0xA9 0x9D 0x7E 0xFC

thenjduke

hexem wrote: »

I just tested within packet tracer 5.2.

Any vlan's created before they were both in the same vtp domain will not be propergated until you add at least another vlan, then all vlan's will be advertised.

By the look's of it he has the trunk, as int f0/1 is missing from vlan brief.

I have not used Packet Tracer for VTP setup but just wondering if the trunking protocols were the same on both switches this is why asking to show the trunking interface

thenjduke

captobvious wrote: »

Passwords different?

switch 1 - MD5 digest : 0x5E 0xCB 0xEE 0x42 0x8D 0x7B 0xE7 0x60
switch 2 - MD5 digest : 0xB8 0x97 0x2F 0xFE 0xA9 0x9D 0x7E 0xFC

Did not even think about this

Good question.

hexem

That would do it

sniper_here

hexem wrote: »

I just tested within packet tracer 5.2.

Any vlan's created before they were both in the same vtp domain will not be propergated until you add at least another vlan, then all vlan's will be advertised.

By the look's of it he has the trunk, as int f0/1 is missing from vlan brief.

Thank you very much,Finally ,its work.
Actually,I have some problem with PT coz it does not support some feature like SDM !!
I can't depend on PT ,But I have no choice

hexem

If you wanna use SDM get yourself GNS3/Dynamips, it run's real cisco IOS, as long as you *legally* get hold or the images, or some other way, you can do everything the physical thing can, except being able to plug in cables for real, can also mess around with switching capabilities.

jjbrog

Try doing a wr(or copy run star) saving the pt file and reload, I find very often in class when I'm working on a project and get stuck things aren't pinging, I am positive I got everything right, then the teacher comes over to confirm everythings right, says it is, saves everything reloads the file and wahla everythings working.

I've had this happen a lot in class, because i am pretty speedy with my configs, and if your doing a lot in a speedy manner packet tracer often seems to get goofy and things not work.

Sometimes I'll need to erase something like "no user jeff pass cisco" in the config and it won't work, and other students might have the same issue.

But we're using 5.1 I have 5.2 at home and don't run into it so much.

captobvious

jjbrog wrote: »

Try doing a wr(or copy run star) saving the pt file and reload, I find very often in class when I'm working on a project and get stuck things aren't pinging, I am positive I got everything right, then the teacher comes over to confirm everythings right, says it is, saves everything reloads the file and wahla everythings working.

I've had this happen a lot in class, because i am pretty speedy with my configs, and if your doing a lot in a speedy manner packet tracer often seems to get goofy and things not work.

Sometimes I'll need to erase something like "no user jeff pass cisco" in the config and it won't work, and other students might have the same issue.

But we're using 5.1 I have 5.2 at home and don't run into it so much.

See my post above.