Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026
erpadmin wrote: » Best of luck to you. Seriously, just to let you know there are a LOT of Higher Education insitutions that are looking for Online Learning Coordinators. With your background, it would be an easy fit and it would be a great career move for you. You can also probably adjunct at some online universities that are also part of B&Ms. Something you definitely may want to look into.
veritas_libertas wrote: » First exam of the semester scheduled for next week... MGC1
uhtrinity wrote: » Good luck. I found the management and leadership exams to go hand in hand with project+. Very common sense if you have worked in a business environment.
erpadmin wrote: » I will definitely be scheduling CIW v5 Foundations (WFV1) within the next week or so. Just read over the mcmcse.com study guide and can see why folks find this a waste of time. I'm just waiting for my MeasureUp so that I can start the study mode immediately. Then take cert mode immediately. Only thing I'll be looking at, and really not that much will be the html stuff. Everything else is pretty much what I've been doing and I'm sure for most folks in the IT for a minute, for them too.
Unforg1ven wrote: » So I went ahead with the whole application process. Took the intake interview Tuesday and if I decide to go would start OCT 1st. Quick Question : They are currently evaluating my transcripts. How long will it take for them to get back to me regarding what transfers/what does not? Thnxs
earweed wrote: » The weird thing about WGU and WFV1 is that everyone has to take this cert. Nothing but this cert satisfies the requirement. If you have every other cert in your degree requirements except this one you still have to take it. It is a joke for any IT Pro to have to take this one.
erpadmin wrote: » I remember the post that explains why that is....it really does go over IT as a whole and is very encompassing of that (or tries to be).
I will definitely be scheduling CIW v5 Foundations (WFV1) within the next week or so. Just read over the mcmcse.com study guide and can see why folks find this a waste of time.
It is a joke for any IT Pro to have to take this one.
themagicone wrote: » Passed 1 of the 3 math classes with 68%. WOOO!! Now to pass my Security+ on Tuesday. If I do that I'll have 39 CU's Done. My term ends Oct 31st so I'm hoping to get in Math classes 2 and 3. Then spend some time on N+. It's not a part of my degree (Security) but being it's a lifetime until 12/31 I figured I should take it. I was worried about the math test when I took it this morning. It was A LOT harder than the pretest. First time that has been the case. But I passed and breathed a big sigh of relief.
petedude wrote: » I'm starting to mess a bit with GTT1 (intro to programming)-- anyone know what documentation is required with the programs submitted? So far as I can see, all that is required to submit to Taskstream is a zip of the program sources itself (the whole project if you're submitting NetBeans stuff) and maybe a cover sheet. Since I'm not enrolled in the course yet, I don't have the full Taskstream rubric handy and I'm working off the assignment details in the COS. They aren't asking for things such as user documentation, flowcharts, etc. are they? *BTW, will need a study partner for GUT1 in coming months if there are any takers.
uhtrinity wrote: » The course code for the first Java course I took was ABT1. It required inline documentation , ie. this part does ...., this variable is ..... The second course required user documentation, flowcharts, etc.
themagicone wrote: » I think there needs to be a standard set of what Mentor require in the classes before allowing the voucher to be issued. As you read threw this thread and the other WGU thread, some mentors require examforce to be sent in, some require labsim records, etc... My mentor on the other hand hasn't asked for anything in the way of records or transcripts. I tell him I'm ready, he sends in my request. Could be that I have passed every test with a huge margin on the first time but I don't know. Just seems without a said standard it leads to a huge confusion.
earweed wrote: » @erpadmin- glad to see you're seeing the task of doing the work for WFV1 from an optimistic viewpoint. It's good to see that someone sees the value in that cert. It is really comprehensive and I, personally, learned a lot from it. The test itself is a mile wide and an inch deep. You'll knock it out of the park.
earweed wrote: » @erpadmin He may have just wanted you to get a review in case you've forgotten stuff over the years.
Exclusively for TechExam members. Applies to boot camps starting before April 30, 2026.