Options

vSphere 4.1 ?

jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
in Virtualization
4.0u1 seems to have an iSCSI bug which a Dell engineer mentioned when using the built-in one and we desperatly want to wait with the new cluster (using Dell SANs) until we have the new Dell firmware and vSphere release.

Did ANYONE heard ANYTHING about a release date ? Dell intends to release a new firmware which works with certain features in 4.1 and the firmware release is due today I believe so I HOPED that is an indication for the vSphere release but I don't see an announcement ANYWHERE ...
My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • Options
    astorrsastorrs Member Posts: 3,139 ■■■■■■□□□□
    Q3-2010
    twitter: @astorrs
    profile: linkedin.com/in/astorrs
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
    astorrs wrote: »
    Q3-2010

    $%^£ icon_sad.gif
    My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    astorrsastorrs Member Posts: 3,139 ■■■■■■□□□□
    Gomjaba wrote: »
    $%^£ icon_sad.gif
    Well Q3 could be anything from July 1st to September 30th.... I would target somewhere in late July/early August - a few weeks before VMworld in SFO.
    twitter: @astorrs
    profile: linkedin.com/in/astorrs
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
    Yea I know. It is just quite frustrating. We had a San blowing up and now run on single hosts on local storage. Now I have a new shiny set of SANs here with the hard decision to make to either wait for the release and risk running server on local storage or implement the setup and risk running into the same bugs. Meh. Should have gone into pigfarming icon_wink.gif
    My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    tierstentiersten Member Posts: 4,505
    Gomjaba wrote: »
    Should have gone into pigfarming icon_wink.gif
    Got some bodies to dispose of then eh? Brick Top? :D
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
    tiersten wrote: »
    Got some bodies to dispose of then eh? Brick Top? :D

    haha not quite .. just a saying here when we are fed up here... Someone found a pig farming job online once with regular working hours and no weekends (by accident lol) .. Since then we always tend to go towards pigfarming :D
    My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    Sunshine_54Sunshine_54 Member Posts: 32 ■■□□□□□□□□
    Are you talking about a bug with the iscsi software initiator? I know these things aren't cheap, but maybe you should consider purchasing an ISCSI HBA card. They're not cheap but you'll find the performance is ALOT better.....
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
    Until now we were running QLogic Dual HBA. As part of this project we have evaluated several iSCSI Sans (Dell,Sun,iStor and even Wudss) and the software initiator was always better in performance. Dell also released some comparison somewhere. We didn't believe it ourselves until we run those tests.
    My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    blargoeblargoe Member Posts: 4,174 ■■■■■■■■■□
    You could run 3.5 U5 and wait for 4.1 and not worry about the bugs
    IT guy since 12/00

    Recent: 11/2019 - RHCSA (RHEL 7); 2/2019 - Updated VCP to 6.5 (just a few days before VMware discontinued the re-cert policy...)
    Working on: RHCE/Ansible
    Future: Probably continued Red Hat Immersion, Possibly VCAP Design, or maybe a completely different path. Depends on job demands...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    jibbajabbajibbajabba Member Posts: 4,317 ■■■■■■■■□□
    blargoe wrote: »
    You could run 3.5 U5 and wait for 4.1 and not worry about the bugs

    We can't. We are hosting partner using VSPP licenses and only got vSphere ones .. Not sure if we can get 3.5 licenses as well, would have to check, but we cannot really afford installing 3.5 first and then upgrade. Could open a whole different can of worms. Been there, done that, bought the t-shirt [1] :)


    [1] and had to throw it away because it was kaputt :D


    Edit: Post 1000 - woop woop ...
    My own knowledge base made public: http://open902.com :p
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.