Nested Policy-Map
burbankmarc
Member Posts: 460
Hey all, I'm trying to shape all my traffic, then nest a policy-map that contains LLQ. But for some reason none of my RTP traffic gets mapped when using this nested policy. Here's the policy-maps when nested:
But when I apply a straight LLQ policy-map it seems to work ok:
I'm pretty sure this is what I have setup at home, I'll look when I'm off work. Anyone see what I'm overlooking?
policy-map Internet-Queueing class RTP priority 250 class class-default fair-queue random-detect policy-map Internet-Shape class class-default shape average 4500000 45000 90000 service-policy Internet-Queueing router#sh policy-map int f0/3/0 !!!!!!!!SHAPING OMITTED!!!!!!!!! Class-map: RTP (match-all) 0 packets, 0 bytes 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: dscp ef (46) Queueing Strict Priority Output Queue: Conversation 136 Bandwidth 250 (kbps) Burst 6250 (Bytes) (pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0 (total drops/bytes drops) 0/0
But when I apply a straight LLQ policy-map it seems to work ok:
policy-map qos-test class RTP priority 250 router#sh policy-map int f0/3/0 FastEthernet0/3/0 Service-policy output: qos-test Class-map: RTP (match-all) 982 packets, 139444 bytes 5 minute offered rate 2000 bps, drop rate 0 bps Match: dscp ef (46) Queueing Strict Priority Output Queue: Conversation 264 Bandwidth 250 (kbps) Burst 6250 (Bytes) (pkts matched/bytes matched) 1/142 (total drops/bytes drops) 0/0
I'm pretty sure this is what I have setup at home, I'll look when I'm off work. Anyone see what I'm overlooking?
Comments
-
networker050184 Mod Posts: 11,962 ModLooks right to me.An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made.
-
burbankmarc Member Posts: 460It was a problem with my IOS version. I upgraded to the latest 12.4T and all is right as rain. Although for some reason it changed my WRED from dscp-based to precedence-based, but no big deal changing it back.