Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
shaqazoolu wrote: » Best of luck sir. I used the CBK exclusively for mine, and I would say it is sufficient, but my job covers several of the domains at least in some capacity so it was a little easier to study for it IMO. I was unaware that Transcender had SSCP practice exams. If that is true, I would say they are definitely worth it. I've used them for Cisco exams and they are worth every penny. If not, cccure.org has good practice exams too. I've seen a couple people on this board that have gotten ISC2 to endorse them, it just takes a little longer from what I understand.
Bl8ckr0uter wrote: » You are actually one of a few people that I specifically wanted to see this.
Bl8ckr0uter wrote: » You are actually one of a few people that I specifically wanted to see this. I have more than a year in access controls along with Network and Communications and Monitoring and analysis. Not much in the other domains though lol. What did you think of the exam? Was it as tough as a Cisco exam (specifically CCNA:S or CCNA)?
shaqazoolu wrote: » In terms of your location dilemma, I did about 90% of my studying in about 2 months, and the vast majority of that was strictly on weekends. I'd say the January date is doable, but not likely. However, like JD said, you're really the only person that can be the judge of that and you will only know after you get neck-deep into the material based on how comfortable you feel with it. There is also the possibility that you are way smarter than I am and you have no trouble passing it in a limited amount of time.
Bl8ckr0uter wrote: » Does anyone know if the SSCP stuff from ucertify is any good?
hustlin_moe20 wrote: » My co-worker passed SSCP last year and he says ucertify is decent but not top shelf. He says stick with the CBK. He likes to shoulder surf when I'm on TE, lol.
hustlin_moe20 wrote: » If I do pass CISSP in the next few weeks, SSCP CBK will be on my radar also. If not, back to CISSP, boooooooooo.
Bl8ckr0uter wrote: » Which do you guys think would be more valuable for an infosec pro? I have noticed that several people which less than 4-5 years of infosec exp have gone for the CISSP Assc rather than doing the SSCP. I am just curious if the CISSP name recognition is such that even not being a "full" CISSP is more valuable than a "full" SSCP. Thoughts?
rogue2shadow wrote: » I would say the CISSP associate would give your better cognition. 8570 wise its the end all be all certification. Passing it as an associate gives you the ability to move around the model even though you're not a full CISSP (except CNDSP Manager which reqs CISSP-Specialty). In terms of actually getting a CISSP job with an associate designation, that may or may not be another discussion all together (can't speak from experience). In either case, having CISSP anywhere on your resumé is a good look
Bl8ckr0uter wrote: » I see your point. Thanks for the clarification.
veritas_libertas wrote: » I'm starting to see the SSCP in job listings on Monster.com, etc. Don't know if that is the beginning of a trend or not. Lockheed Martin is one of the ads that caught my attention.
Bl8ckr0uter wrote: » I have seen this as well. SSCP seems to be somewhat popular but the CISSP is much, much more popular.
veritas_libertas wrote: » No argument from me on that. I'm just saying that if you want to take it won't hurt you any.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.