phoeneous wrote: » For the purpose of the CCNA, classful addressing uses Class A, B, or C subnet masks and classless doesnt. So with classful addressing, you will have networks like 10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/16, and 192.168.1.0/24.
shanparames wrote: » My question is whether it is possible to have the classful routing protocol with an ip address 151.78.1.1/25 ? Please advise me Thanks S.Swaminathan
alan2308 wrote: » From what I've seen of Cisco questions, both in the Academy quizzes and exams, and the actual CCNA, there is nothing to assume.
gosh1976 wrote: » I would say yes. As a proof of concept I set up three routers connected together and put two pc's on the end routers. I set up RIPv1. I took a class A address space: 10.0.0.0 but I used a /16 subnet mask. the middle router has a routing table like this: Gateway of last resort is not set 10.0.0.0/16 is subnetted, 4 subnets R 10.0.0.0 [120/1] via 10.3.0.3, 00:00:12, FastEthernet0/0 R 10.1.0.0 [120/1] via 10.2.0.1, 00:00:15, FastEthernet0/1 C 10.2.0.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1 C 10.3.0.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0 However, If I take one of the subnets in the middle and make it a /30 in order to conserve space then I am using VLSM and I no longer have connectivity and can't ping from pc to pc. If I then change the routing protocol to RIPv2 - The routing tables are rebuilt and I can ping again. Perhaps someone with a bit more experience could verify what I'm thinking.
Kelvin Wang wrote: » Hi, pardon my ignorance, I am not able to understand what this test prove. It means RIPv1 does not support VLSM and RIPv2 does? why are there 4 subnets in 10.0.0.0/16? I have learned class B and class C subnetting, is this consider class A subnetting?
gosh1976 wrote: » It is true RIPv1 is a classfull routing protocol so it does not support VLSM. RIPv2 is a classless routing protocol so it supports VLSM. In the RIPv1 example I borrowed 8 bits for the subnet mask so yeah I suppose you would call it class A subnetting. Part of the point was that the concept holds true for Class B or Class C addresses. In classfull subnetting the subnet mask must be the same for every subnet. The other point was that when I changed one of the subnets to a /30 I lost connectivity between the PC's and the routing table only showed the directly connected subnets. Then when I changed the routing protocol to version 2 the routing tables showed 4 subnets again and I could ping again. There are 4 subnets in 10.0.0.0/16 because I designed a little site with 4 subnets. As you can see in the diagram there are 4 subnets. Each interface on a router connects to a different subnet. Those happen to be fastethernet interfaces connected with crossover cables.