tiersten wrote: » Despite what feelings people may have about Steve himself, Apple, their products and the associated pricing, some of the comments on that article are just unbelieveable. The amount of hatred for Apple which then gets pushed onto Steve is incredible. Somebody may be my worst enemy and I wouldn't wish some of stuff being said onto them!
tpatt100 wrote: » Meh Apple is the new Micro$oft as far as online bashing goes. I remember my old Slashdot surfing days and how evil Microsoft was.
tiersten wrote: » Apple is the 300 lbs gorilla still considered the underdog for some bizarre reason. I believe the new evil empire is Facebook which is closely followed by Google.
tiersten wrote: » The Apple stock price will probably tank yet again because Steve is temporarily not at the helm.
tpatt100 wrote: » I swear its like they were going to eventually go back to DOS because hardly anybody uses it and they can reclaim it for their own.
tiersten wrote: » The Apple stock price will probably tank yet again because Steve is temporarily not at the helm. Bit silly it does as Steve can't be making every single decision in the company down to the individual component choice and UI layout. Despite what feelings people may have about Steve himself, Apple, their products and the associated pricing, some of the comments on that article are just unbelieveable. The amount of hatred for Apple which then gets pushed onto Steve is incredible. Somebody may be my worst enemy and I wouldn't wish some of stuff being said onto them!
Chris:/* wrote: » I think Jobs gets too much specific credit for Apple's successes as they are right now. I completely agree that he is at the helm and and controls the direction and drive of them company but people forget he has an entire design and engineering team who actually do the work.
mikedisd2 wrote: » That's just tall poppy syndrome, it's human nature. The bigger they are, the greater and easier the target.
cablegod wrote: » Their mantra "Do No Evil" is pure BS if you ask me. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
tpatt100 wrote: » I think Facebook is a bigger threat.
tpatt100 wrote: » People get way too comfortable with that site. Young people looking to get into politics are going to get hammered with Facebook archives lol.
Forsaken_GA wrote: » The problem is that investors see Steve as the great savior. Apple did ok when he was there the first time, then he leaves and Apple starts sinking, to the point where Microsoft has to sink money into them to keep them afloat, and then Steve comes back and Apple starts showing record profits. So whether it's reasonable or not, Jobs health is going to have a direct effect on the stock. This is probably why he absolutely refuses to talk about it.
Beach wrote: » Might be an alright time to get in on some stocks....if it dips enough.
Chris:/* wrote: » I agree Jobs is an outstanding businessman much like Gates but both are known to higher brilliant men/women and correctly kill poor projects. When you look at the companies when they are doing well I look at the lead developers of the specific projects that are making the companies profitable.
tpatt100 wrote: » I think Facebook is a bigger threat. People get way too comfortable with that site. Young people looking to get into politics are going to get hammered with Facebook archives lol.
Bokeh wrote: » They should bring back Woz for a bit.
MrAgent wrote: » He works for the company I just took a job with. Hes the Chief Scientist for FusionIO
tiersten wrote: » Sounds like more of a PR thing than actually him being an expert on Flash technology and leading the company research.
cablegod wrote: » Tiersten, I was referring to Google by the way.
cablegod wrote: » Trust me, he is more than a "figurehead" at Fusion-io.