nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

VRRP hesitatition

Akiii

Hi,

I've ran into some test exercises and can't manage to get this clear hope that you guys can help me!

R1
ip add 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
vrrp 1 priority 110
vrrp 1 ip 192.168.2.1

R2
ip add 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.0
vrrp 1 priority 100
vrrp 1 ip 192.168.2.1

And the answer says that if R1 fails then R2 will become the master virtual router but as soon as R1 recovers it will regain the master role..

Now if there's no prempting, how can this be achieved? Or just the question itself is wrong

Thanks

Find more posts tagged with

SAVE $250 on Your CISCO Boot Camp — Use Code "EXAM26"

Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026

View CISCO Boot Camps

Comments

networker050184

VRRP preempts by default.

Akiii

networker050184 wrote: »

VRRP preempts by default.

wow thanks

it seems that this information has passed my studies

networker050184

You can have a read here.

Cisco IOS IP Application Services Configuration Guide, Release 12.4 - Configuring VRRP [Cisco IOS Software Releases 12.4 Mainline] - Cisco Systems

Akiii

networker050184 wrote: »

You can have a read here.

Cisco IOS IP Application Services Configuration Guide, Release 12.4 - Configuring VRRP [Cisco IOS Software Releases 12.4 Mainline] - Cisco Systems

thankyou!