RomBUS wrote: » They say that if you do get the 299 material, its pretty much the same as 298. If you are planning to eventually go for 299, you can get the 299 material to study for the 298 AND 299 just to cover both costs for studying for these.
Psoasman wrote: » If you are going to do the 298, you might as well do the 299 to get the specialization. They basically cover the same material. The 299 is more along the lines of "this is what it is" and the the 298 is "how to design it" The 299 book will get you through both exams. The 298 book is fairly dry, but a good reference.
kamikaze_worm wrote: » My Main question here is... Does it make 298 difficult to pass if you havent done 299. I recon I can still do it without. What do we think? Kamikaze_worm
Devilsbane wrote: » At first glance it is very overwhelming and I'm trying to develop a strategy to make it more manageable. When taking the exam, should I preview the questions first, jot some notes down on the topics and then go check out the case study, or read the case study and then go to questions. I think it makes more sense to preview the questions. If these are like the normal Microsoft questions then the case study is 90% fluff and I should focus my attention to the topics that will be asked questions about. Skim to find what I need, and then take notes on that. And then finally answer the question.
Shadly1 wrote: » Is that how you ended up doing it? I finished my book and videos and just started on the MeasureUp today. I'm a little overwhelmed by it. I tried reading a whole case study and then answering the questions. That worked well for the first one but I got my case studies all mixed up when I got into the second one. Now what I'm doing is reading the question and scouring the case study for key words that were in the question. That seems to get me through it a little easier but I'm not happy with my accuracy that way. I tend to miss little tidbits that I probably would have caught if I read the whole case study. This is making me a little nervous... Does the actual test layout allow for easy back and forth between the case study and question?