Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
DragonNOA1 wrote: » Awesome job fellow 700 club & MCSE:S member! Feels great, huh?
Essendon wrote: » Congrats on that well-earned MCSE! Would you look into upgrading to the MCITP:EA/SA anytime soon and this is it for Microsoft certs?
Shadly1 wrote: » Congrats on that pass! So what's the scoop? How many case studys were there? What kind of Microsoft trickery did you have to deal with? Was it all "read the question, go find the answer" stuff or was any of it "common sense then click the button"?
Devilsbane wrote: » I emailed mcp@microsoft.com asking if that broke the NDA and I was told no, but I never feel comfortable disclosing that kind of thing. I used http://www.techexams.net/forums/mcsa-mcse-security/13271-passed-70-298-today.html as my source for intel on this exam. Unfortunately my exam was very different from the one that this guy had. I did about twice the work, filled up 9 sheets with notes, but I guess I can't really complain since I passed.
Devilsbane wrote: » Wow I'm such a loser. I refreshed the mcp.microsoft.com website probably 50 times yesterday and I've got to be coming up on 10 today.
Devilsbane wrote: » Security?? What is that? It looks like I'm in no mans land now. Last night I saw where the 298 is now on my transcript, but the MCSE isn't. I guess it takes a little longer for them to realize that all of the exams are complete. In the certification planner it has everything checked off. It can't be too much longer...
Devilsbane wrote: » Is it possible to get a commercial CA (such as verisign) to give you a certificate that you can use as a CA certificate to issue certificates? I wouldn't think so, because now your enterprise would be allowed to create certificates that would be trusted by everyone. If you have bad policies in place and one of the certs you issued gets compromised, then Verisign could take a lot of heat on that. But that is exactly what Transcender says to do. To support digitally signed e-mail transmissions for both local and Internet-based users, a commercially signed root certificate should be purchased.
To support digitally signed e-mail transmissions for both local and Internet-based users, a commercially signed root certificate should be purchased.
RobertKaucher wrote: » Totally irrelevant now, but... That is not what they are saying at all. You are misreading. They are saying purchase a comercially signed certificate so that you can use it to digitally sign emails - NOT use it to issue other certificates.
Shadly1 wrote: » Certificates don't issue certificates. CAs do.
Devilsbane wrote: » A CA issues the ticket, but it requires a certificate to do so.
Devilsbane wrote: » That makes sense except for this line. "A commercially signed root certificate should be purchased."
DOS wrote: » I see says the blind man. Now I remember, thanks for the link.
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.