Turgon wrote: » The training vendors are laying instructors off. Many have taken permanent jobs. We expect to hit 30000 CCIE's anytime soon. Anyone watching CCIE pass testimonies on the grey vendor sites can see that most of the passers are in the Middle east or Asia, fewer in the US. Has the CCIE peaked? My feeling is that the timeserved CCIE's (10+ years network experience) are in a very good position as in any piechart driven company because *someone* has to know how things actually work, and how much time and expenditure is needed to make them work. The newly minted CCIE's less so. They are 10 years too late and cheaper CCIEs are available for hire in China (the numbers of Chinese CCIEs is soon to surpass US CCIEs and they are way cheaper to hire).
Mrock4 wrote: » I think the CCIE training business is drying up.
SteveO86 wrote: » If CCIE numbers in the US continue to decline, won't we just see another drive for CCIE certified individuals within the next few years when even people let their CCIE expire? The less people with expired CCIE's will just create a better market for those with a valid CCIE right?
WiseWun wrote: » I hope it did not reach it's peak. A lot of my friends are heading to the IE track after completing their graduate program. Some doing self study, others boot camp.
ehnde wrote: » I don't mean to offend anyone in this thread, but as you push your way up the technical ladder (it doesn't have to be Cisco, it could be Microsoft, Juniper, or a mix of higher level certs) you will be handed excuses by friends, family, coworkers, news articles or other sources to not even try. So are you going to give up? No, you're NOT!!! ...(well, a couple of you won't give up )
Mrock4 wrote: » I strongly believe out of all the people who say they'll get their CCIE, maybe 30% will follow through with preparing. Less will attempt the lab. Another "+" to getting a CCIE that I haven't seen mentioned: Job security. After getting a raise or two, I will probably be in CCIE salary territory. BUT! What if I lose my job for some reason- get laid off, quit, etc? I probably won't make that salary anymore. The CCIE is a way to be reasonably certain you'll get a salary within a certain range. So, even though I can get in the same ballpark salary-wise, I want the CCIE so that I stay in that ballpark, even when switching employers.
WiseWun wrote: » I hope it did not reach it's peak. A lot of my friends are heading to the IE track after completing their graduate program. Some doing self study, others boot camp. Rumor has it that there are some training vendors mainly from Asia who have the actual lab exams. Have you guys heard of this before?
shodown wrote: » This is very true. I have opened several TAC cases where I get a CCIE and they don't know there head from there ass and they are suposed to be specialist in this area, or consultants that are very cheap and we find out they don't know what they claim to know. The reality as I see is is that more of the world is going to get connected and those IE's in other countries will soon be having to get there country online. I know a IE in africa who wanted to come to the US, but he was making more money traveling africa building networks so he stayed. There will be plenty of jobs for US/UK people who choose to really be professionals and experts.
rakem wrote: » More people are looking at other Vendors - Juniper are grabbing market share of Cisco every day. Perhaps people are chasing other vendor certs? I know I have been for the past 9 months...
ColbyG wrote: » A lot of people talk about becoming CCIEs, but very, very few actually do it. Once you get the the senior engineer/architect level, it's really not as important as people make it out to be. If you want short contracting gigs for big money, it's useful. If you work for a partner who needs more CCIEs for status, it's useful. For most other positions, it's pretty on a resume, but not crucial to getting a good job and making good money.
Turgon wrote: » Lab cheating has always happened. I think it hit it's peak with v3 so like a lot of other people I find myself studying for a new version these days. I recall one CCIE telling me 5 years ago when we worked in the same office that he hotelled before his lab attempt and met another candidate that was very confident about his prospects in the lab next day because he had seen the actual test in advance. Technical interview weeds out the players but it all depends what you want from a CCIE. If you just want a tick in the box for partner status that is one thing. On the other hand if you need a CCIE to design complex networks or support complex mission critical infrastructure they really do need to know what you they are talking about and what they are doing. Which takes years..you can learn (for example) MST in books, but migrating a complex RPVST+ environment to MST is a whole different learning curve requiring people with excellent qualities.