Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
NateC16 wrote: » Hey guys I was hoping some of you could help shed some light on this! Anyway, I guess this is more of a general question about certs. Anyway, I'm still in college right now, last semester though, and I have this senior class where the IT majors, which is me, are to choose between a 15+ page paper on a topic that interests you, a 2 hour or longer seminar on something, or a certification and I decided to do a cert. And since I really do enjoy the server side of things I kind of wanted to go with the Microsoft server 2008 cert. Now I have 3 months to try to get this cert. Which means taking all 3 tests.. And I have like a bunch of other crap to do for the end of the year as well, so in all reality I don't have much time and I'm not 100% sure that I can study/take/pass all 3 tests in 3 months.So I guess my question is this: Is it even worth attempting to go for these certs in this short amount of time? I do understand that certs are not EVERYTHING, but I kind of figured if I could do this i may get a better chance than someone who doesn't have one.. but yeah..And if you guys had some other suggestions for some certs that would maybe be a little easier for the time I have that'd be awesome!Edit: I was kind of thinking CCNA Thanks in advance!
JDMurray wrote: » Will studying for the certification be the only thing you are doing over that three month period, or do you have other courses to study for? If you have other subjects to study, I would suggest picking the one cert you feel is the most interesting (that is, easiest to study for) and go for it. My vote is that you skip the CompTIA certs and go for your technician class amateur radio license. It's much cheaper to get, and much more valuable to have, than any CompTIA cert. If Jamestown College has a Ham Radio club, the membership will provide you all of the help you need.
Turgon wrote: » Not to deride HAM and all that but is CompTIA not a little more beneficial than an amateur radio qualification for fledgling IT professionals? I agree with cost of Comptia..it's a racket. But certification is.
JDMurray wrote: » The paper only gets your foot in the door for a first interview; it's your knowledge and experience that gets you the job.
JDMurray wrote: » Will studying for the certification be the only thing you are doing over that three month period, or do you have other courses to study for? If you have other subjects to study, I would suggest picking the one cert you feel is the most interesting (that is, easiest to study for) and go for it.
If you were keen to do a server one are you not able to just do one of the individual MCTS's i.e 640, or does it need to be theMCITP.
NateC16 wrote: » Honestly, I just kind of wanted to do a cert because, it may not even be close to being true, but I want to think that if I have a cert of some sort on my resume that it's possible the employer where I go for an interview, sees that I did a little extra work, and it's possible that I may get a chance over someone who doesn't have one? I'm not sure, if that's even close to how it works but..
JDMurray wrote: » I'm thinking it's better to study on your own pace to really learn the certification material than to just "cram to get the paper" for a class project. The paper only gets your foot in the door for a first interview; it's your knowledge and experience that gets you the job.
ptilsen wrote: » Just to clarify, was your earlier post meant to indicate that cramming in those certs and not really learning the material is a waste of time? Or, were you saying that those certifications have little to no value in the job market? To OP, my suggestion would be to get Net+. Network+ is a good collection of material for the entry-level. There is enough information that you should definitely get something out of 1-2 months of concentrated study. It's also easy enough that you should be able to pass it in that time. Getting MCITP:SA should be nearly impossible in that timeframe for someone with no experience, and indeed, you wouldn't learn the material well enough to actually use it IRL if you crammed it in that timeframe. That said, if the requirement is to get a certification, you should understand that you don't need three tests to get a Microsoft certification on Sever 2008 R2. You can take exam 70-640 to obtain Microsoft Certified Technology Specialist: Windows Server 2008 Active Directory, Configuration. It's by no means an easy test for someone with no experience, but I would say it is obtainable in a three-month timeframe. Similarly, you can take ICND1 and achieve Cisco Certified Entry Networking Technician. This is the first "half" of CCNA, if you will, and is a cert in and of itself. It is similar "theory" material to Net+, but contains more practical switching and routing material. Once again, this is a certification that should fulfill your requirement and actually help you learn useful skills and knowledge. Of those three options, 70-640 is by far the hardest, while Network+ is the easiest. Taking either the MS or Cisco exam would be wise if you are already set on either as a career path. If you're not, Network+ would be a better pick IMO as it is vendor-neutral and its material will be a good starting point into either career path or a separate career path altogether.
NateC16 wrote: » Thanks for the replies guys, I really do appreciate it! As for this, no it wont be the the only thing I do all semester, I have to read a pretty lengthy spanish book for my spanish minor and prep a presentation on it, I have a pretty decent sized database/website project to do, and I also run track. So I guess you could say my time is kind of limited. Sadly I asked him the other day and he said if I wanted to do the server 2008, I would need to do all the tests so I could get the "package cert" or whatever. As for this, I do prefer to work towards a server test, but like everyone says those tests are beasts and honestly since I really have no XP in this type of work, I guess I really don't think I have enough time to study when I have quite a few obligations to do. And I guess they don't want it to be "toooooo easy" so we have to do like 2 tests. Like how the A+ requires 2 tests to get the full A+ cert. Or how the MCITP takes 3 to get the "full" cert. Honestly, I just kind of wanted to do a cert because, it may not even be close to being true, but I want to think that if I have a cert of some sort on my resume that it's possible the employer where I go for an interview, sees that I did a little extra work, and it's possible that I may get a chance over someone who doesn't have one? I'm not sure, if that's even close to how it works but..
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.