Route Redistribution and Tagging help

MrXpert

I'm stuck on this problem. I have two routers running both OSPF and EIGRP and am performing 2way redistribution on them both. I have set the metrics and also included a route map so that routes are tagged. Problem is that router JACK is using the path through 192.168.23.3 to reach the 1.1.1.0/24 network which is in EIGRP domain. This is sub optimal. I want both routers JACK and JOHN to use the most efficient paths so I did route tagging. Can anyone please look at this config and tell me what I have done wrong?



JOHN#SHOW IP ROUTE
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

D 192.168.12.0/24 [90/307200] via 192.168.13.1, 00:28:24, FastEthernet0/0
1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
D EX 1.1.1.0 [170/409600] via 192.168.13.1, 00:28:24, FastEthernet0/0
C 192.168.13.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
10.0.0.0/28 is subnetted, 2 subnets
S 10.0.45.0 [1/0] via 10.0.34.4
C 10.0.34.0 is directly connected, Serial0/0
C 192.168.23.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
C 150.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Tunnel0


router eigrp 1
redistribute ospf 1 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500 route-map OSPF>EIGRP
network 150.0.0.0
network 192.168.13.0
no auto-summary
!
router ospf 1
router-id 3.3.3.3
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute eigrp 1 subnets route-map EIGRP>OSPF
network 192.168.23.3 0.0.0.0 area 0
!
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 10.0.45.0 255.255.255.240 10.0.34.4
!
!
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
!
access-list 1 permit 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
!
route-map OSPF>EIGRP deny 5
match tag 77
!
route-map OSPF>EIGRP permit 10
set tag 88
!
route-map EIGRP>OSPF deny 5
match tag 88
!
route-map EIGRP>OSPF permit 10
set tag 77
!

************************************************


JACK#show ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

C 192.168.12.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/0
1.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O E2 1.1.1.0 [110/20] via 192.168.23.3, 00:06:25, FastEthernet0/1
D 192.168.13.0/24 [90/307200] via 192.168.12.1, 00:42:15, FastEthernet0/0
10.0.0.0/28 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O IA 10.0.34.0 [110/74] via 192.168.23.3, 00:06:25, FastEthernet0/1
C 192.168.23.0/24 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/1
D 150.0.0.0/8 [90/297295616] via 192.168.12.1, 00:16:17, FastEthernet0/0

router eigrp 1
redistribute ospf 1 metric 10000 100 255 1 1500 route-map OSPF>EIGRP
network 192.168.12.0
no auto-summary
!
router ospf 1
router-id 2.2.2.2
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute eigrp 1 subnets route-map EIGRP>OSPF
network 192.168.23.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
!
ip forward-protocol nd
!
!
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
!
access-list 1 permit 1.1.1.0 0.0.0.255
!
route-map OSPF>EIGRP deny 5
match tag 77
!
route-map OSPF>EIGRP permit 10
set tag 88
!
route-map EIGRP>OSPF deny 5
match tag 88
!
route-map EIGRP>OSPF permit 10
set tag 77

mattau

without a diagram it is abit hard to visualise but I have a question. How are you putting 1.1.1.0 into eigrp? is it already an external eigrp route at AD170?

Because this will cause it to be preferred in ospf. A deny or permit TAG is not going to stop a route from being installed in the routing table on jack. The tag will only permit or deny a prefix from being redistributed from 1 routing domain to another. You would either need to modify the AD for that prefix or put in an ospf distribute list. I believe you can match a tag in a route map in combination with a distribute list also

I think this is what you're doing. on john eigrp to ospf tag = 77
then on jack ospf to eigrp deny tag 77

so the route will still be installed as ospf. Just not allowed to be redistributed back into eigrp. which causes suboptimal routing

ps. If you put the distribute list on jack for 1.1.1.0 then be sure to do it on john also because D EX 1.1.1.0 will be installed in the table and jack will send this to john and john will then have the same problem as what jack did