nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

IPv6 addresses

veritas_libertas

So I think I found a mistake in Odom's ICND2 book, but I'm not sure. Table 17-9 on page 604 shows the following:

Global Unicast 2000::/3
Unique Local FD00::/8
Link Local FE80::/10
Multicast FF02::/16

Everything looks right to me except the Unique Local which I'm seeing in Lammle's and others as FC00::/7. Am I wrong or right?

Find more posts tagged with

SAVE $250 on Your CISCO Boot Camp — Use Code "EXAM26"

Exclusively for TechExams members for Infosec Boot Camps starting before April 30, 2026

View CISCO Boot Camps

Comments

veritas_libertas

Scratch that, I guess it's both? http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk648/tk872/technologies_white_paper0900aecd8026003d.pdf

NetworkVeteran

Multicast FF02::/16

That multicast range is also incorrect, from my recollection.

FF00::/8 is multicast.
FF02::/16 is link-local multicast.

veritas_libertas

NetworkVeteran wrote: »

That multicast range is also incorrect, from my recollection.

FF00::/8 is multicast.
FF02::/16 is link-local multicast.

Thanks. The CCNA's light overview of IPv6 leaves me more confused than when I started. I'm going to read a book on IPv6 when I'm done with the CCNA.

elderkai

Routing TCP/IP has a pretty good section about IPv6. I also had a thread about a month ago here asking a bunch of questions about IPv6. Maybe reading through it could answer a few questions?