aaron0011 wrote: » FFS, Cisco is stupid when it comes to naming certifications.
Zartanasaurus wrote: » This particular one sounds silly. I wouldn't say they are stupid in general with names.
aaron0011 wrote: » How about CCIE Unified Communications.
shodown wrote: » I just saw this. No way I can make it that fast. I'll prob study a few thing that I know are going to continue like SIP, and dial plans. However I suspect a lot of changes. Its based on CUCM9 and its suppose to have a lot of services.
Yozh wrote: » I`m sure using G1 ISRs (28xx) will do for the CCIE Lab setup still, the IOS is there some minor features might not work..... Over all I think router investment in Gen 1s will be ok... What I`m more worried in the new licencing model for the 9.1 which requires 60 days use then a licence or you cant add anymore devices, what is going to be a way around that ? Backup/restore ? Thoughts ?
To all of our CCIE Voice professionals. Here is a statement from Fred Weiller, Director of Marketing at Learning@Cisco:"We are listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will be adjusting the CCIE Collaboration requirements. As a quick preview of the evolution of the CCIE Collaboration certification, a current holder of the CCIE Voice designation will now be able to migrate to a CCIE Collaboration credential by taking the CCIE Collaboration written exam only. We appreciate all of the great feedback and patience of the community while we update our webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating further details about this modification as soon as possible."Thanks,Julia at Cisco