Options

Studying for MCSA in Server 2008 (Exams 640, 642, 646)

riddlemerightriddlemeright Registered Users Posts: 4 ■□□□□□□□□□
in MCTS / MCITP on Windows 2008 General
I recently signed up to take online videos for an MCSA in Server 2008. I also want to do some reading, but I don't learn well that way and the main Microsoft books are somewhat overwhelming. Any suggestions on books that cover the material for exams 640, 642, and 646 in an "idiot's guide/cliff's notes" kind of approach?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • Options
    LexluetharLexluethar Member Posts: 516
    Honestly I think the MS publishing books are the best for these topics. I've purchased MS books for all three of those exams, and two supplemental books for the 640 and 642. I must say that the MS book was WAY better at explaining exam topics and mapping out how to accomplish certain things.

    I would suggest doing a ton of labs as well. I'm trying cbtnuggets right now - and i must say i'm pretty impressed with the detail thus far. Studying for the 642, and while all i did was lab and read for the 640 (and passed) i'm not have as much luck on the 642.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    riddlemerightriddlemeright Registered Users Posts: 4 ■□□□□□□□□□
    thank you for the reply. I signed up with quickcert.com and am impressed with the videos thus far. I'm just nervous about getting all the knowledge in the next 15 months or so to pass all 3 exams. I've always had a super difficult time with read textbooks so was hoping there were smaller volumes written that would give me much of the info that I can use as a supplement.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    Cisco InfernoCisco Inferno Member Posts: 1,034 ■■■■■■□□□□
    look for the 70-642 book by Don Poulton. I read some of it at a barnes and noble and it seemed great. Also, its well reviewed on amazon.
    Microsoft books are notoriously known to be a pain. I've used them for the MCDST a while back and they were horrible.
    2019 Goals
    CompTIA Linux+    [ ] Bachelor's Degree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    riddlemerightriddlemeright Registered Users Posts: 4 ■□□□□□□□□□
    His series is also very large. An easier read is great, but I'm looking for more of a cliff's notes type of thing, if it exists.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    Cisco InfernoCisco Inferno Member Posts: 1,034 ■■■■■■□□□□
    compared to the error ridden microsoft textbooks, i believe Poulton's book to be far better.
    I do not know of any cliffnotes type thing. Its best to do the actual reading than to try and skip it.
    2019 Goals
    CompTIA Linux+    [ ] Bachelor's Degree
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    cruwlcruwl Member Posts: 341 ■■□□□□□□□□
    These tests are so broad I don't think a "cliff Notes" version is even possible. You could always take the exam objectives straight from MS' web site and go to technet and read up/lab specifically on those.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    blargoeblargoe Member Posts: 4,174 ■■■■■■■■■□
    cruwl wrote: »
    These tests are so broad I don't think a "cliff Notes" version is even possible. You could always take the exam objectives straight from MS' web site and go to technet and read up/lab specifically on those.

    This is how I study Microsoft exams usually.
    IT guy since 12/00

    Recent: 11/2019 - RHCSA (RHEL 7); 2/2019 - Updated VCP to 6.5 (just a few days before VMware discontinued the re-cert policy...)
    Working on: RHCE/Ansible
    Future: Probably continued Red Hat Immersion, Possibly VCAP Design, or maybe a completely different path. Depends on job demands...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    riddlemerightriddlemeright Registered Users Posts: 4 ■□□□□□□□□□
    great suggestions. quickcert is suggesting reading MCTS: Windows Server 2008 R2 Complete Study Guide (Exams 70-640, 70-642 and 70-643).

    I'm going to start that one for now. I hope I didn't just bite off more than I can chew at the moment. The salesperson said it takes about 40 hours of study time per exam. Have other people had similar experiences?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    sratakhinsratakhin Member Posts: 818
    I guess I'm a little bit slow or something, but it definitely takes more than 40 hours to study for MS exams. I did 70-290 and 291 in about 80 hours and 70-680 in about 100 hours, including labs.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    LexluetharLexluethar Member Posts: 516
    Ya, way more than 40 hours for me as well on the exams i've done. I mean in total I can read all of the material and lab in far less time, but to actually understand it and remember the specifics (which is extremely important on MS exams) I study more than 40 hours total.

    I haven't put down the amount of hours, realize MS expects the average candidate to have at least 1 year experience with server 2008R2. While that is overkill IMO for these certifications 40 hours is EXTREMELY low unless you already work with this technology on a day-to-day basis.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    nosoup4unosoup4u Member Posts: 365
    Much longer in my experience for the server exams, especially if you have no hands on work with them.

    Seem pretty common on these boards to fail at least one of the exams, even with years of experience.

    I've failed both the 70-640 and 70-642 with five years of experience with daily hands on experience.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Options
    horusthesunhorusthesun Member Posts: 289
    Cisco Inferno wrote: »
    look for the 70-642 book by Don Poulton. I read some of it at a barnes and noble and it seemed great. Also, its well reviewed on amazon.
    Microsoft books are notoriously known to be a pain. I've used them for the MCDST a while back and they were horrible.

    Currently reading cert guide for 70-640 by Don Poulton, it is very informative, and I as well, highly recommend reading.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.