Book now with code EOY2025
QUIX0TIC wrote: Im assuming that you have Router A and the S0 has an 30.1 adx and Router B S1 has a 30.2 adx. When you change Router A S0 to 40.1 adx... you cannot ping the 40.1 or you cannot local ping 127.0.0.2 the 30.2? And of course, I will assume you are on the router that you are trying to ping?
QUIX0TIC wrote: BTW... if you unplug the cable... can you ping the interface?
johnnynodough wrote: what about an extended ping?
ed_the_lad wrote: Hi Rossonieri, The picture is 2 2500's connected back to back via serial ports.I'm not trying to ping a remote machine, im trying to ping my local interface.As you can see from the outputs above i can ping the remote machine.Then i change the local IP address on my serial port and for some reason i cannot ping this local interface anymore even though its UP UP.I do understand how routing works and this is not a routing issue.
Worktruck wrote: Actually it's real simple both interfaces have to be on the same network or subnetwork in order to see each other and communicate. That is the reason why you can see it in your first example and not in the second.
ed_the_lad wrote: You want a picure ill give u a picture RouterA RouterB 11.0.0.2/30 11.0.0.1/30 RouterA#ping 11.0.0.2 100% perfect RouterA#ping 11.0.0.1 100% perfect Now i change the IP address of RouterA RouterA RouterB 12.0.0.1/30 11.0.0.1/30 RouterA#ping 12.0.0.1 0% Why????? RouterA#ping 11.0.0.1 0% Expected So as you can see my question is why cant i ping 12.0.0.1 since its configured on a local interface with Line Up, Protocal Up.
ed_the_lad wrote: I configure an ip address on a local serial interface which is physically up with protocol up.This serial is connected back to back with another router in the same state. When the ip addresses are in the same subnet all is good as expected.Now when i change one of the ip addresses to a different subnet i am unable to ping my local interface. This seems a little stange for me as now im wondering what is exactly happening when you ping your local interface.Is the router sending your ping to the remote router which sends it back? Internally how does the router behave in this situation? For me the router should check the arp cache, see the mac is a local interface and process the packet, why does the remote device effect this?
2lazybutsmart wrote: ed_the_lad: here's my 2 lb's worth of insight in this little tricky thing. I've checked, double checked, and triple checked that scenario on my lab and the only conclusions I can arrive at are: A- Serial interfaces need to have the following properties before they can be pinged or be available for communication from other serial interfaces: 1- Layer 2 communication must be up and running (physical link, clock rates, dce-dte, etc.). Once everything's up up, 2- If you're running IP, then both serial interfaces must have valid logical addressing at Layer 3. By this, I mean addresses have to be on the same network. This is probably due, IMO, to the fact that serial interfaces don't use ARP or MAC addresses or anything of that sort to physically track interfaces on the same network as there is only one physical network segment possible between a point-to-point serial link. I've also tried getting the serial interfaces to use the ip's of the other ethernet interfaces that use them for communication. What can be or can not be done with serial interfaces is pretty interesting. B- Ethernet interfaces must be active at Layer 2, but don't need to have valid logical addressing at Layer 3 for the interface to respond to local pings. I think this is due, again IMO, to the fact that Ethernet interfaces use ARP to resolve the MAC address and the logical address is just used when communication is being made to other interfaces. HTH 2lbs
rossonieri#1 wrote: i've check on my router : your config doing fine - changing any ips - pinging everywhere - no problemo. maybe that back2back cable is the problem...?? or - we agree that our discussion should stop here..
2lazybutsmart wrote: 2- If you're running IP, then both serial interfaces must have valid logical addressing at Layer 3. By this, I mean addresses have to be on the same network. This is probably due, IMO, to the fact that serial interfaces don't use ARP or MAC addresses or anything of that sort to physically track interfaces on the same network as there is only one physical network segment possible between a point-to-point serial link. I've also tried getting the serial interfaces to use the ip's of the other ethernet interfaces that use them for communication. What can be or can not be done with serial interfaces is pretty interesting.
2lazybutsmart wrote: To sum things up: the nature of serial links being a point-to-point connection probably gives them these sensitive layer 3 attributes. There's only one physical network segment there anywayz.
Use code EOY2025 to receive $250 off your 2025 certification boot camp!