Inerax wrote: » Thank you for the tips. Where would you recommend starting starting? From what I have seen (and could be very very wrong here) network+ seems like a good starting place. What would you guys think?
beaucaldwell wrote: » I'm in the same boat as you, and from what I've be reading here you can do the CCENT and then take the ICND2 to upgrade to the CCNA. The CCENT will cover just about everything the N+ does and more. Some say to do the N+ before CCENT to get the basics on networking vendor neutral, some will say just skip it and do your CCENT. Either way CCENT/N+ have a lot of overlap, so if money is tight, you're better off doing the CCENT for $150, and then the CCNA for $150 than the N+ for $269 and then paying for the CCENT/CCNA on top of it... (also keep in mind that's less $ you're spending if you happen to fail one of the exams). Of course if you got the time, don't mind the overlap, and don't mind spending more money on the test and study material, get both cause it will never hurt to have more...
Inerax wrote: » So many options lol. So you are saying study up for the CCENT first? Can you point me to some good study guides for the CCENT? I know that you cannot know how much I already know but, how long does the study take on average?
beaucaldwell wrote: » I decided to start my CCENT and skip the N+ (im just starting this now), but I may go back later and get it just to have another one on the resume. You can go N+ first and there is nothing wrong with that, but just keep in mind you'll be reading the same material again a lot when you go to the CCENT. That would make the CCENT easier but would make it take longer and cost more $$. From what I've gathered, if you don't have experience in networking, you should expect to spend 6 months minimum to really learn and retain everything. Don't rush it, go for the knowledge retention and not the quick certify. As for books, I chose the CISCO Press CCENT/CCNA Certification Library package by Odom; which from my research is a highly recommended book, the other popular choice being Sybex. I'm piecing together a home lab rather than using stuff like packet tracer/GNS3 as those have limitations on what you can do. This is what someone wrote to me when I was asking about labs and I found it helpful in explaining a real life example of why real equipment is better than a virtual lab: "You will hear ALOT of people on here say Packet Tracer and GNS3 are all you need to pass the exams but one of my frustrations is both programs come with there own set of limitations. As you use them you will see those limitations. I got REAL equipment so I did't have to deal with those limitations. IN addition, in 2013 I went on a few job interviews and when I told them I was sitting for my CCENT I was asked if I had a Home Lab or I was using Packet Tracer ? I responded Packet Tracer and both people I interviewed gave a "sigh" kind of look. It was after this experience I decided to invest in "ME" and get real equipment so I can learn this stuff inside and out. Pre-made kits do "cost" but if you go looking on E-bay you will find buying everything in pieces may be just as expensive as buying a kit."