Techguru365
TechGuru80
hannism wrote: » I didn't think it was hard, but there are different versions of the test out there. I thought mine was a walk in the park. Two of my coworkers thought they had failed the test, but they passed. One said it was the hardest test he had ever taken. Another guy in my unit who isn't even technically savvy took the exam and passed. I only know one person who took the test who failed. He said the book he used didn't prepare him for the exam. After he failed, he watched the Professor Messer videos and bought a different certification book, and passed the retest. The Security+ isn't a technical test, it's mostly theory. You will need to know the ports of the technologies you are using such as SCP, SFTP, FTPS, HTTPS, etc, etc. Don't just know the ports, know if they use TCP, UDP or both. Based on what you wrote, I would probably postpone the test for two weeks. If you don't feel ready, don't take it.
TheChameleon wrote: » The exam proctor I talked to said that most people fail the Security+. They indicated that some even "cry" after likely because in order to keep their job they needed to pass.
markulous wrote: » For those that took it through WGU, was the material enough? I've got the Exam Cram by Hausman and the Labsim as my main resources. I also found Darril's blog. I am just starting to study this week. Since I got a 50% on the practice exam, I know I've got a bit of work to do. I'm assuming I can probably take the test in about 4 weeks.
crimsonavenger wrote: » TBH the WGU resources were okay, the Labsim assessment test was good because it was actually more demanding than the SYO-301 exam ended up being unfortunately without the Simulation questions though. But as far as study I'd recommend D. Gibson's book or the Sybex over what is offered through the course. Labsim for study isn't horrible, but I would use it as supplemental, as always Ucertify is a joke (getting their own answers wrong.)