This is called seriously failing an interview


This cracks me up.
It would be interesting to see if they recouped any of the lost time in wages. It has to be very frustrating getting a candidate in who is not even close to the task.
Original Source
https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/C4D22AQFX_3Fiode6hA/feedshare-shrink_8192/0?e=1549148400&v=beta&t=C_Zx7setYkmbKyUjro24zWhTP4Xv1Gq_qNJtCkbc4zE
Comments
Master of Science in Information Security and Assurance - Western Governors University
Bachelor of Science in Network Administration - Western Governors University
Associate of Applied Science x4 - Heald College
1) isn't that the purpose of your hiring process to find qualified candidates, and not just pick from the cream of the crop that 100% meets your requirements and then some?
2) makes me wonder who is more ignorant, the applicant or the three people who took 2 hours to "immediately" know the applicant was unqualified.
3) calling someone unqualified so harshly in writing over what could possibly be just a bad interview on applicant's part is a good way of losing more than just money.