Book now with code EOY2025
why its good to save on ip address space to a decent extent
I want to use an example I previously saw in another post: Corporate network: 202.2.2.0 Corporate site: 50 hosts Site 1: 48 hosts Site 2: 30 hosts Site 3: 23 hosts Site 4: 12 hosts Serial links: 4 "Give the IP subnet addy, 1st usable host, last usable host, broadcast, and subnet mask for each." I actually did the calculations and got the answer (mostly) right, but I want to talk about some other things here, what's all this looking like when doing the configurations from ur telnet screen? And what kind of topology are we looking at visually? So here are some quick questions I have: This address 202.2.2.0 is assigned to the network by an ISP, right? Is each site represented by a separate router interface basically? For instance, Site 1: 48 hosts Subnet=.0, 1st host=.1, last host=.62, broadcast=.63, mask=255.255.255.192 So when configuring an Ethernet interface on whatever router, it would be like 202.2.2.1 with a 255.255.255.192 prefix mask, so when a packet arrives at this router, the router parses the table, looking for the packets destination addresses, sees it is valid address between .1 - .62 and forwards it out the corresponding interface. But I thought the router would parse the table and send the packet out through whatever interface due to the summarazation of the address (for quicker parsing and reduction of router memory blah blah)? I am confused here. And then it would be the same concept for the other interfaces on the same router, like on another ethernet interface it would be site 2 with 30 hosts and a 255.255.255.224 mask? and so on and so on, I don't know, just sounds like I am reaching with this one...
Gateway of last resort is not set 70.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks D 70.0.0.0/8 is a summary, 00:12:07, Null0 C 70.5.5.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0 202.2.2.0/24 is variably subnetted, 9 subnets, 5 masks D 202.2.2.128/28 [90/2297856] via 202.2.2.157, 00:10:20, Serial0 D 202.2.2.152/30 [90/2681856] via 202.2.2.157, 00:10:20, Serial0 C 202.2.2.156/30 is directly connected, Serial0 D 202.2.2.144/30 [90/3705856] via 202.2.2.157, 00:07:51, Serial0 D 202.2.2.148/30 [90/3193856] via 202.2.2.157, 00:08:38, Serial0 D 202.2.2.64/27 [90/3321856] via 202.2.2.157, 00:07:51, Serial0 D 202.2.2.96/27 [90/2809856] via 202.2.2.157, 00:08:38, Serial0 D 202.2.2.0/26 [90/3833856] via 202.2.2.157, 00:02:11, Serial0 D 202.2.2.0/24 is a summary, 00:12:07, Null0
markzab wrote: Hey, had to bring this thread back up real quick to make sure I understood properly. In your example you had... 10101100.00010000.00001100.00000000 -->172.16.12.0 10101100.00010000.00001101.00000000 --->172.16.13.0 10101100.00010000.00001110.00000000 -->172.16.14.0 10101100.00010000.00001111.00000000 -->172.16.15.0 With the summary route being the location where all the matchi9ng bits stopped. In this case 172.16.12.0/22. But for my understanding, lets change the first route from 12.0 to 10.0, which would be... 10101100.00010000.00001010.00000000 -->172.16.10.0 10101100.00010000.00001101.00000000 --->172.16.13.0 10101100.00010000.00001110.00000000 -->172.16.14.0 10101100.00010000.00001111.00000000 -->172.16.15.0 In this situation, am I correct in saying that the summary route would be 172.16.8.0/21? Am I getting this?
Use code EOY2025 to receive $250 off your 2025 certification boot camp!