Compare cert salaries and plan your next career move
mikej412 wrote: I don't see any routing protocol or default static route configured in your config. How does the router know where to send internet traffic?
mikej412 wrote: I also don't see the ACL applied to your "external interface"... but NAT should take care of some of the stuff. If you want traffic to come in on some ports (like web server) -- then you'd map those ports to your internal (nat'ed) hosts.
access-list 101 permit ip any host 81.88.156.99 eq 23 access-list 101 permit ip any host 81.88.156.99 eq 22 access-list 101 permit ip any host 81.88.156.99 eq 5900 access-list 101 permit ip any host 81.88.156.99 eq 80 access-list 101 permit ip any host 81.88.156.99 eq 443
dtlokee wrote: well the second example you've removed the "permit tcp any any established", that would break most of your tcp protocols. access-list 101 permit ip any host 81.88.156.99 eq 23 access-list 101 permit ip any host 81.88.156.99 eq 22 access-list 101 permit ip any host 81.88.156.99 eq 5900 access-list 101 permit ip any host 81.88.156.99 eq 80 access-list 101 permit ip any host 81.88.156.99 eq 443 If the intent here was to allow Telnet, SSH, HTTP and SSL inbound, remember the protocol is TCP not IP, and the port number that the traffic is going to is a random number above 1023 try somthing like this access-list 101 permit tcp any eq 80 host 81.88.156.99 that would allow traffic from a web server to the client. I would add the permit tcp any any established back to take care of the tcp protocols, instead of creating an entry for each one. Or perhaps creating a reflexive acl (not sure if the 831 supports them)
Compare salaries for top cybersecurity certifications. Free download for TechExams community.